This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum
This article is part of the Reggae WikiProject, a group of Wikipedians interested in improving the coverage of articles relating to ska and reggae. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page.ReggaeWikipedia:WikiProject ReggaeTemplate:WikiProject ReggaeReggae
This article was copy edited by Miniapolis, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on August 8, 2013.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors
Looking at the page history, an external reviewer found the article had a problem with item 6 on the B-class criteria: "The article presents its content in an appropriately understandable way." I do not see any problem with excess use of technical terms in this article, but breaking up some of the long paragraphs to create more white space and clearer logical structure would help with readability. Sharktopustalk12:09, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, thanks for clearing that up. I just hate when users who have never edited the article drop by and reassess it without any explanation. –Dream out loud (talk) 16:49, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I'm moving the article since this soundtrack album has no "official title". The cover of the album reads "Original Motion Picture Soundtrack" while the album disc and spine read "Music from the Motion Picture Soundtrack". The cover and discs for the "Make Tonight Beautiful" and "Tell Me Is It True Singles" note that the song is from "the motion picture soundtrack album Speed 2: Cruise Control"[1] and "the motion picture soundtrack to Speed 2: Cruise Control"[2] implying that the soundtrack's name is basically the same as the movie. So renaming the article as such would make the most sense. –Dream out loud (talk) 05:37, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I'll be glad to take this review. Initial comments to follow in the next 1-3 days. Thanks in advance for your work on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 15:43, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
On first pass, this appears solid and ripe for promotion. I appreciate all your work on it. I made a few copyedits as I went, so please doublecheck that I haven't inadvertently introduced any errors. I'll do some last checks for the checklist, and if all's good there, I'll be promoting this one in just a moment. -- Khazar2 (talk) 18:24, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Prose is good. Many sources are behind subscription paywalls and thus not immediately accessible, but those that are free to check show no copyright issues.
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).