Jump to content

Talk:Special Operations Command (Brazil)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): BriRHP31. Peer reviewers: Wldub, Sokeefe19.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 09:58, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Barrett sniper rifle & Benelli shotgun

[edit]

On the "Equipment" section, two entries are listed only as, and link to, the manufacturers themselves. If anyone out there knows and reads this, it needs to be clarified which Barrett sniper rifle(s) and Benelli shotgun(s) are in use. I'd do so myself if I knew, but I'm not too familiar with Brazilian SOF. Spartan198 (talk) 14:58, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Plans for Page Expansion

[edit]

Hi. I am a student looking to improve the quality of this page. If you have any ideas for sources, please let me know. thanks BriRHP31 (talk) 18:41, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

planned sources:

http://www.copesp.eb.mil.br/index.php/institucional-2 — Preceding unsigned comment added by BriRHP31 (talk • contribs) 02:18, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(Preliminary outline for improvement of this article)

  1. Add to introduction (which is currently 1-2 sentences. Add info about founding of group, who founded it, when, where it is based, also add what branch of military it is apart of (Planalto Military command).
  2. Add more to the "Creation" section, which is light, and struggles with grammatical sense. Information about the structure of the command, and larger Brazilian military can be added. Also, the actual brigades of C Op Esp will be added.
  3. A larger problem with the whole article is the inability of the author to write correctly. Most of the article is not correct grammatically, despite the impressive content in the article. I will have to go through and re-word and check for grammar in order to bring the article up to reading speed. BriRHP31 (talk) 02:20, 8 March 2017 (UTC) :Honestly, I think the grammatical / style issues are a product of translation difficulties as someone (or a computer translator) went from Portuguese to English. Let me know if you need help. Katherine.Holt (talk) 18:45, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Article Edits

[edit]

The top section makes claims about the location of the command without citations. It might also be more appropriate to have the information in the body of the article. Wldub (talk) 15:43, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A lot of the information under Creation of C Op Esp would be better placed under a different section because it is talking about their current capabilities. Wldub (talk) 15:46, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There are also too many peacock statements. Wldub (talk) 15:47, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Aside from some minor structural and grammatical issues, my main issues is that there are no citations throughout the entire article. Admittedly it's short, but I would like to see more footnotes, especially with all the peacock statements. Sokeefe19 (talk) 18:51, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Brazilian Special Operations Command. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:45, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Brazilian Special Operations Command. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:43, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Special_Operations_Command_(Brazil)&oldid=1265162571"