This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Soyuz flight VS22 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Europe, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to European topics of a cross-border nature on Wikipedia.EuropeWikipedia:WikiProject EuropeTemplate:WikiProject EuropeEurope articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rocketry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of rocketry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RocketryWikipedia:WikiProject RocketryTemplate:WikiProject RocketryRocketry articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight articles
Good use of wikilinks and, where needed (not often), explanatory briefs
Rocket section well-written.
Might suggest rephrasing the "Manufactured..." sentence to make certainly clear that it was modified for climate at the Samara centre, but not necessary.
Similarly for a brief explanation that the payload is satellite comm. tech, in case that isn't clear/for clarity on why it's integrated via a mobile tower for readers who aren't good with tech.
Payload section good.
May benefit from a brief explanation of throughput (again, for readers with less tech knowledge), but not completely vital because the idea is clear without it
Could have '(lag)' next to the mention of latency, but it's in the cite quote and near the top of the latency article, so equally not vital for understanding and info available on the page
Flight seems good, made minor technical edit (adding "the" before Fregat, so readers don't think the upper stage's given name is Fregat)
.svg){kind=small}
.jpg){kind=small}
A few ideas for improvement, but nothing stopping this from being GA. Very nice. Kingsif (talk) 03:13, 22 September 2019 (UTC)