Talk:Soprano Home Movies

Soprano Home Movies is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.

This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on April 28, 2011.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
February 23, 2008	Peer review	Reviewed
March 10, 2008	Featured article candidate	Promoted
December 20, 2013	Featured article review	Demoted

Current status: Former featured article

Television: Episode coverage Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Ironic?

What is so ironic about the gun being illegal?124.185.246.104 10:16, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Answer: Because Tony just got off from being pinched on illegal gun charge.

I'm not going to change it because it will create a revert war, but that's not irony. People call anything that's odd or coincidental "ironic" when it's usually not the case (Alanis Morrisette possibly being the worst offender). Irony must somehow deconstruct itself, as something is both true and false at the same time. Wesleymullins 16:54, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're right, but I must point out that Alanis Morrisette song is a great example of "irony" and I'm still debating whether it was intentional or not. --148.241.24.45 03:56, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Alanis Morrisette song IS NOT IRONY!! Its annoyances. "Ten thousand spoons when all you need is a knife" is not irony. Irony would be looking for a knife, and having a Cutco Sales Rep knock at your door. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.182.240.92 (talk) 05:49, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Should probably also mention that Bobby drops the gun at the scene of the crime. I think that's rather important.

The shirt is rather important, I think. But the gun? It's standard to drop it at the scene. --148.241.24.45 03:56, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Where in the episode was Dominic Chianese’s son?

Yeah, what did that mean... who is Dominic in the episode?

Junior Junior makes the sheep joke Wesleymullins 16:54, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Who's hair got shot?

In Janice's story, there were four in the car - Johnny Boy, Livia, Junior and Junior's goomar. Janice tells us that the goomar is the source of the story. The point of the story is that Johnny Boy shot Livia through the hair, and that she had to get a bob the next day. Tony doesn't like the story being told because, as he says, it makes the family appear 'disfunctional'. I haven't reviewed my Tivo to verify this, but I'm pretty sure it was Livia, not the goomar who got the new hair style. I don't think it would make much sense if it were Johnny Boy's goomar - would you expect Johnny Boy's kids to be familiar enough with a goomar to notice, the very next day, that she just got a bob? Can anyone confirm? Ronnotel 18:54, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It was Junior's girl.

No, it was not it was Livia. Trust me, i own every episode

Fair use rationale for Image:Sopranoshomemovies.jpg

Image:Sopranoshomemovies.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 05:17, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Sopranoshomemovies.jpg

Image:Sopranoshomemovies.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 23:46, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Sopranoshomemovies.jpg

Image:Sopranoshomemovies.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 23:11, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Working on it

Working on this now. Feel free to contribute.–FunkyVoltron ^talk 20:22, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Featured article

Does this really meet the featured article criteria? Lots of sections are entirely unreferenced and possibly contain original research. Also, reference 1 appears to be WP:SYNTH. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 00:35, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Soprano Home Movies. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 22:17, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Soprano Home Movies. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071116222056/http://www.wga.org/writtenby/writtenbysub.aspx?id=2354 to http://www.wga.org/writtenby/writtenbysub.aspx?id=2354

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:00, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Soprano Home Movies. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120306022352/http://www.televisionwithoutpity.com/show/the_sopranos/soprano_home_movies.php?page=16 to http://www.televisionwithoutpity.com/show/the_sopranos/soprano_home_movies.php?page=16

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:17, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]