This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article was created or improved during the #1day1woman initiative hosted by the Women in Red project in 2020. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Health and fitness, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of health and physical fitness related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Health and fitnessWikipedia:WikiProject Health and fitnessTemplate:WikiProject Health and fitnessHealth and fitness articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
Do we just assume he is wrong? He suggests that she did not want to hear about the pandemic and certainly did not want to lean. But reading Lewis can be frustrating. It feels as though there is an ocean beneath the situation but his writing is about the shiny, frothy bits at the top. But is he completely wrong? How can we tell? It is going to be hard to find public sources either way. Everything was in panic mode. Were there public conferences? Who attended? Can we find statements about people who helped, really helped, during the pandemic and then be able to determine something about when there are no statements? It is going to be a difficult thing.
05:35, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
I think it is odd and suspicious for the article to make no mention of ML's book, but I agree that is hard to treat as proven fact. A separate controversy section would be reasonable, merely pointing out the existence of disagreement and allowing interested persons to form their own opinion of ML's reporting. This should not run afoul of living persons biography rule as I understand it. Current (May 2022) article is very one-sided. 24.130.35.240 (talk) 16:29, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not to mention that Michael Lewis is not even mentioned. In his new book on the pandemic, The Premonition, Angell is perhaps the villain-in-chief, who actively tried to suppress any actions the California government might have taken in January and February 2020.C. Cerf (talk) 14:57, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
