Talk:Song of Eärendil

Song of Eärendil has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: January 28, 2022. (Reviewed version).

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Middle-earth Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle-earth, which aims to build an encyclopedic guide to J. R. R. Tolkien, his legendarium, and related topics. Please visit the project talk page for suggestions and ideas on how you can improve this and other articles.Middle-earthWikipedia:WikiProject Middle-earthTemplate:WikiProject Middle-earthTolkien
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Note: Though it states in the Guide to writing better articles that generally fictional articles should be written in present tense, all Tolkien legendarium-related articles that cover in-universe material before the current action must be written in past tense. Please see Wikipedia:WikiProject Middle-earth/Standards for more information about this and other article standards.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Song of Eärendil/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: AryKun (talk · contribs) 09:20, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks for taking this on. Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:21, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"how the mariner" → Capitalize Mariner.
- Surely not – we wouldn't capitalise other professions like shipwright, soldier, farmer.
  - I see that, but Mariner is capitalized in the article about him and I have a hazy memory of it being capitalized while I read LOTR. AryKun (talk) 03:03, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Why is the name of the poem italicized in the body and not in the lead? Also, if you're italicizing throughout, you should add an italic title template as well.
- Italics removed.
"the Song of Eärendil" → Starting the sentence with the title (in active voice) would sound more natural (i. e. The Song of Eärendil is the longest poem in The Lord of the Rings)
- We do that in the lead; the History section varies it to accommodate the "also called..." clause.
"extraordinarily complex" → Seems a bit hyperbolic.
- Justified here by the large number of versions and then the variations with Bilbo's song. This isn't our opinion but that of Hammond and Scull; I've repeated the ref.
"Bilbo's song" → Mention his last name here
- Spelt out at first occurrence.
"Middle-earth the mariner" → Capitalize Mariner.
- See above.
"half-Man, half-Elven" → Link Man and Elven.
- Done.
"sort of Paradise" → Paradise is capitalized here but not in the lead.
- Lower case it is.
"described by Shippey" → This is the first mention in the body, add first name and link.
- Done.
"the elvish tradition" → Capitalize Elvish.
- Done.
"words in elven-tongues" → Is "elven" capitalized here in the book? Very pedantic nitpick, I know.
- No. Tolkien had a complex rule for capitalisation and even he found it hard to follow.
"scholar and philologist Tom Shippey" → Link philologist. Also, full name and link should be earlier, as noted above.
- Moved.
"rooted in Celtic folk" → Link Celtic.
- Linked.
Nice work overall.
- @AryKun: Many thanks as always. Chiswick Chap (talk) 16:14, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]