Talk:Social Democratic Party of the Free City of Danzig

A fact from Social Democratic Party of the Free City of Danzig appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 24 January 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that in response to the growing National Socialist influence, the Social Democratic Party of the Free City of Danzig formed a 4,500-man strong paramilitary force?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2010/January.

Wikipedia

Socialism Low‑importance

	Socialism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics: Political parties Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Political parties task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Totally OR...

...but i just noticed that the street address the party used in 1928 was later used as a army recruitment office during the war, see [1]. Does this perhaps mean that the building was confiscated by the nazis? --Soman (talk) 17:11, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That poster was made in 1919, not by the Nazis in WWII, so (maybe) the party used former barracks or an administrative building.HerkusMonte (talk) 16:07, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I had missed the date of the poster. --Soman (talk) 09:47, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]