Talk:Snakehips (duo)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Snakehips (duo) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Requested move 23 March 2016

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved. Number 5 7 19:03, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Snakehips (band) → Snakehips
Snakehips → Snakehips (disambiguation)

– Only subject which is just "Snakehips". Unreal7 (talk) 20:07, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose both people are just "Snakehips" the formulation of their article names is different from usage in the world. -- 70.51.46.39 (talk) 04:51, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – the rationale presented does not justify or compensate the additional ambiguity that this move would cause. Precision is good. Dicklyon (talk) 05:26, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support WP:PTOPIC per page views. SST flyer 09:28, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Misplaced template Unreal7 you have done it again; RMs moving a disambiguation page must start with the disambiguation page, not from one page. This avoids project alerts and watch weighting one article. In ictu oculi (talk) 09:46, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

In ictu oculi, that's not true. If anything, it's generally preferable to put the article first over the dab page, to make sure its watchers will see the RM.--Cúchullain ^t/c 14:23, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And oppose completely fails Google Books test In ictu oculi (talk) 09:46, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Although the band currently predominates in the page views,[1] I don't see them as overriding the historical significance of the dance, the two people called Snakehips, and all other topics combined. The band is new so there's probably a fair amount of WP:RECENTISM driving up its numbers.--Cúchullain ^t/c 14:23, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.