Jump to content

Talk:Smoking in association football/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Tayi Arajakate (talk · contribs) 05:47, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hello C of E, I'll be taking up the review for this article which I will present it to you shortly. I hope you will find my feedback to be useful. Tayi Arajakate Talk 05:47, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    The C of E, I've completed the review and listed issues in the comments and assessment sections below. It is a well written article and was an interesting read, has near no issues other than that it needs considerable expansion. If you need time for that, I can put it on hold but I'll give 7 days before I either pass or fail it. Tayi Arajakate Talk 18:22, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

[edit]
  • The bolded portion in the lead should not have wikilinks in them.
  • I could not locate any other issues in the article so its good regarding everything else but I have one big concern which needs to be addressed. It appears mostly centered around the UK and Italy, with a couple minor mentions for other countries which should be expanded on; e.g., Germany, France, etc. Not to mention, there are a lot more countries were football is a major part of the sporting culture which find no mention in the article; e.g. Spain, Netherlands, most South American countries, etc.

Assessment

[edit]
  1. Comprehension: The comprehension is good.
  2. Pass Pass
    Criteria Notes Result
    (a) (prose) The prose is clear, concise and understandable. Pass Pass
    (b) (MoS) The article is compliant with the manual of style. Pass Pass
  3. Verifiability: The article is verifiable.
  4. Pass Pass
    Criteria Notes Result
    (a) (references) The article has a list of references and inline citations for all material in the body. Pass Pass
    (b) (citations to reliable sources) Sources used are reliable. Pass Pass
    (c) (original research) No original research found. Pass Pass
    (d) (copyvio and plagiarism) No copyright violation or plagiarism found. Pass Pass
  5. Comprehensiveness: The article is adequately comprehensive.
  6. Neutral Neutral
    Criteria Notes Result
    (a) (major aspects) The article has an adequate coverage. Neutral Neutral
    (b) (focused) The article is focused without any unnecessary deviations. Pass Pass
  7. Neutrality: The article is neutral.
  8. Pass Pass
    Notes Result
    The article is compliant with the policy on neutral point of view. Pass Pass
  9. Stability: The article is stable.
  10. Pass Pass
    Notes Result
    No edit warring or content dispute. Pass Pass
  11. Illustration: The article is well illustrated.
  12. Pass Pass
    Criteria Notes Result
    (a) (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales) No copyright issues found. Pass Pass
    (b) (appropriate use with suitable captions) Use and captions are appropriate. Pass Pass
@Tayi Arajakate: I have added some more worldwide content, how is this? The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 06:37, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The C of E, the coverage is better than before but I still think its lacking a lot, especially with respect to South America. Tayi Arajakate Talk 13:12, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Tayi Arajakate: I've just added some more for Argentina, Brazil and Paraguay. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 08:43, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The C of E, alright. I have checked them and I still think it can be expanded a lot more but the overall coverage might be about enough for the good article criteria. Since there are no other issues with the article, I'll promote it. Good work on it in general! Tayi Arajakate Talk 14:17, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]