This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Retailing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of retailing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RetailingWikipedia:WikiProject RetailingTemplate:WikiProject RetailingRetailing
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Apple Inc., a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Apple, Mac, iOS and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Apple Inc.Wikipedia:WikiProject Apple Inc.Template:WikiProject Apple Inc.Apple Inc.
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
Wholesale removal of citations and categories is not acceptable editing practice and further such edits will be considered vandalism. I've clicked through each source and they all still work (even if one is archived; this is not unusual). I like to assume good faith. Based on behavior I can only guess that someone is here to do something OTHER than build an encyclopedia. BusterD (talk) 15:49, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
To the editor that keeps reverting to non-relevant content
Removal of citations when not pertinent to the content is acceptable practice as is removal of in-article external links. I assume good faith on your behalf and I will allow this version to remain because it's simply not worth the effort to make it correct. Based on behavior combined with action, I can only guess that something else non-constructive is at play here. Jyork23 (talk) 18:02, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I have repaired the link to the last citation, which had misdirected over time. All three citations are from reliable sources independent of the subject, and they each directly detail some aspect of the subject mentioned in text. Since at least three editors disagree with the blankings, User:Jyork23 should get consensus before removing this material again. When Wikipedians disagree we don't merely quote rules, we discuss to find a solution which meets those rules and the need to build an online encyclopedia based on sources. BusterD (talk) 18:35, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]