Talk:Small Aircraft Transportation System

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Still Active?

This article describes SATS in the present tense, but I (in a cursory search) couldn't find evidence that this is still an ongoing project or development. Additionally, there appear to be some non-sequitor or hard-to-verify claims made in this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JohnLoeber (talk • contribs) 06:31, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

This article and its claims make no sense:

-How is VLJ a solution to the 9/11 problem? It only creates much more potential hijack targets, smaller ones which are harder to detect and because the energy of a moving object is squarely related to its speed and only linearly related to its mass, the destructive capability of an impacting VLJ will still be comparable to a B-737, since both fly at high speed. A pair of Mustangs can fell towers just as well as a 767. Osama will appreciate lower costs.

-Considering the poor state of earth's natural environment and especially the large amount of ozone destruction due to jet exhaust in the higher altitudes, it is crazy to replace "mass transit" airlines industry with a zillion VLJ "air taxis". The bigs, Airbus and Boeing worked very hard to achieve fuel economy on B787 and A380 comparable to european-style small cars, that is 5-6 liters per 100 kilometers. These VLJs will burn three-five times that much kerozene per seat. And of course the jet exhaust right into the stratosphere damages Earth much worse then the zero-altitude car tailpipes do.

-All in all, somebody seen too much Jetsons on TV as a kid. Such people should not be in NASA or FAA and invent VLJs. It should be considered that there was not absolutely any airliner disaster in the USA for almost five full years between 2001 November and 2006 late August. Every day thousands of B737 were flying with a million people onboard and none crashed. There will be VLJs colliding midair every day and fell on houses. Then in 20 years a new Ross Perrot will need to write a new book titled "Unsafe at any altitude". 195.70.32.136 12:18, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

To User:195.70.32.136|195.70.32.136

I guess neither content nor grammer are important when you post here? Save the political rhetoric stick to facts and proof read before you post!

VLJs colliding every day and falling on houses? Seriously? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.158.20.2 (talk) 14:00, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Small Aircraft Transportation System. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071201174825/http://www.atsl.cee.vt.edu/aiaa_papers.htm to http://www.atsl.cee.vt.edu/aiaa_papers.htm
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071201174825/http://www.atsl.cee.vt.edu/aiaa_papers.htm to http://www.atsl.cee.vt.edu/aiaa_papers.htm
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070222004147/http://www.atsl.cee.vt.edu/sds_papers.htm to http://www.atsl.cee.vt.edu/sds_papers.htm
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071011043154/http://www.atsl.cee.vt.edu/trb_papers.htm to http://www.atsl.cee.vt.edu/trb_papers.htm
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20041015055536/http://sats.larc.nasa.gov/main.html to http://sats.larc.nasa.gov/main.html
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.rti.org/MCATS/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071011043159/http://www.atsl.cee.vt.edu/tsam.htm to http://www.atsl.cee.vt.edu/tsam.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:51, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]