Jump to content

Talk:Slavery in colonial Spanish America

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
the imperial Spain did not have colonies, but virreintatos, capitanías  and provincias, all of them condsidered part of the country the same as the mainland or metropoli. Every citizen in every single part of the empire had the same rights. Slavery was abolished in the leyes de indias in 1548. This article is just not academic according to oficial historia.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Carlsontemple.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 15:35, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reference= Montejo, Esteban (2016). Barnet, Miguel (ed.). Biography of a Runaway Slave: Fiftieth Anniversary Edition. Northwestern University Press. ISBN 978-0-8101-3342-6.

[edit]

Dear Carlstak, When making historical references, it is important to rely on historical documents rather than literature. Thank you. 194.38.172.194 (talk) 09:30, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have checked and this is a biography by an anthropologist. The source appears to be widely used and considered as mostly reliable by others. Do you have sources that contradict this? If there are particular elements that have been contradicted or challenged, we could add "According to Esteban Montejo" to clarify what his view is, and then do the same for any opposing viewpoints.Lewisguile (talk) 13:47, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid reference

[edit]

When making historical references, it is important to rely on historical documents rather than literature 194.38.172.194 (talk) 14:49, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your comment doesn't make sense. This is a legitimate reference. Slave memoirs and ethnologues are perfectly acceptable references. If you want to blank out this information, you will need consensus among editors, otherwise it may be considered disruptive. Do you have evidence that other sources doubt Esteban Montejo's account? Lewisguile (talk) 11:09, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The author himself recognized what he wrote is literature and not history 31.164.184.21 (talk) 08:43, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Are there others to add to this? If we can establish consensus that this is a novel and not a biography or ethnology, then I am happy to change this myself. I've struggled to find sources. Lewisguile (talk) 09:19, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]