Talk:Sharron Davies

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sharron Davies article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Sports and Games

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	Sports portal This article is supported by the sports and games work group (assessed as Low-importance).

United Kingdom Mid‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

England Mid‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Devon Mid‑importance

	Devon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Devon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Devon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DevonWikipedia:WikiProject DevonTemplate:WikiProject DevonDevon
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Swimming Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Swimming, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Swimming on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwimmingWikipedia:WikiProject SwimmingTemplate:WikiProject Swimmingswimming
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Olympics Mid‑importance

	Olympic Games portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Olympics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Olympics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OlympicsWikipedia:WikiProject OlympicsTemplate:WikiProject OlympicsOlympics
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women's sport Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's sport (and women in sports), a WikiProject which aims to improve coverage of women in sports on Wikipedia. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Women's sportWikipedia:WikiProject Women's sportTemplate:WikiProject Women's sportWomen's sport
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

BBC

This article is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the BBC. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the BBC Portal.BBCWikipedia:WikiProject BBCTemplate:WikiProject BBCBBC

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Tasks for WikiProject BBC:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Improve BBC, BBC News (TV channel) and BBC News to Good Article status following previous reviews, create BBC Computer Literacy Project (in light of forthcoming 30th anniversary)
Cleanup : Chucklevision - references and general clean-up, Pebble Mill Studios - over-detailed and long, BBC World Service Television - unreferenced and confusing
Copyedit : BBC News, Broadcasting House
Expand : Top 20 start-class BBC articles with most importance: BBC Japan, BBC World Service Television, BBC Lifestyle, BBC Two Northern Ireland
NPOV : Criticism of the BBC (See comments)
Stubs : Stub-Class BBC articles
Other : *Restructure the category
- Add infoboxes to the BBC articles without infoboxes
- Add free-use images to biographical articles where possible
- Add references to Goa Mix (see assessment) and Coat of arms of the BBC
- Return Dad's Army to a Good article. (See comments)
- Reassess BBC following improvements to article.

Television

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

This article should adhere to the gender identity guideline because it contains material about one or more trans women. Precedence should be given to self-designation as reported in the most up-to-date reliable sources, anywhere in article space, even when it doesn't match what's most common in reliable sources. Any person whose gender might be questioned should be referred to by the pronouns, possessive adjectives, and gendered nouns (for example "man/woman", "waiter/waitress", "chairman/chairwoman") that reflect that person's latest expressed gender self-identification. Some people go by singular they pronouns, which are acceptable for use in articles. This applies in references to any phase of that person's life, unless the subject has indicated a preference otherwise. Former, pre-transition names may only be included if the person was notable while using the name; outside of the main biographical article, such names should only appear once, in a footnote or parentheses.

If material violating this guideline is repeatedly inserted, or if there are other related issues, please report the issue to the LGBTQ+ WikiProject, or, in the case of living people, to the BLP noticeboard.

Early TV appearance

The first and only time I've seen Sharron was when we went to watch the filming of Celebrity Squares in London back in the early 1980s.

I was very pleased to see her because we all fancied her (and still do) whilst admiring her too. She didn't contribute much but it was probably one of her first gigs like this.

Besides, the show also featured Kenny Everett who as you can imagine took over the whole thing (though he was subdued in the second show - maybe the booze/drugs had worn off or they are warned him to calm it down).

It was hosted by Bob Monkhouse but I don't recall other celebs. But who cares when we got Sharron, Bob and Kenny. All for free too. Royzee (talk) 11:17, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TV appearance

Has just been on Celebrity Island with Bear Grylls but quit this evening. 12 Sep 17 ^[1] Just putting this in here as I may forget to update properly, and at least it is noted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.37.65.147 (talk) 21:07, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ http://www.channel4.com/programmes/celebrity-island-with-bear-grylls

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Sharron Davies. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/5n5A8GRQY?url=http://www.swimmingworldmagazine.com/lane9/news/489.asp to http://www.swimmingworldmagazine.com/lane9/news/489.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:56, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WP:COI

Potential WP:COI issue from @Sixonline who has only really edited this article, removed negative coverage and added promotional info like a training series she launched on her website. These are red flags. This article may therefore omit certain issues and may need fixing. Solipsism 101 (talk) 00:33, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

vandalism?

I've reverted an edit which attributed a position to a prominent person (Madeline Groves), which was the opposite of that which she actually held (see reference in text). I'm unclear as to whether this was intentional or accidental, but as the other edits made by the user appeared to have a clear point of view behind them, I have reverted them all for the time being.

I do think it's important to make sure we present the issue of transgender people in sport in as neutral a manner as possible. Particularly as there is already a wiki page which goes into the matter in more detail.

In my opinion this one should only report the views of Sharon Davies, and possibly the support/criticism of other prominent sports people, with as little as possible about whether those views are factually correct (as this would be involve a duplication of effort). Criticism may be relevant in order to avoid the appearance that her views are universally held, but in that case I think it should be kept as brief as possible

Please could we discuss any further changes to the section "Trans women in sport and modelling" here, before going ahead? 2A00:23C6:2A8F:DE01:B5A0:7675:C6E5:7064 (talk) 02:41, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NPOV

The article currently reads as follows: "In 2019, Davies entered the debate about the participation by trans women in female sporting competitions, opposing such participation and citing an alleged biological advantage trans women hold in sports."

I tried to remove "alleged", but that was reverted by User:2A00:23C6:2A8F:DE01:A989:E407:46E1:9B0C with a statement that my edit was non-neutral and that (s)he was reverting "back to neutral language".

There is not enough space in the edit summary for me to explain why I felt that the previous language was non-neutral (I was trying to make it more neutral) so here I am.

Use of the word "alleged" implies "questionable truth" or "declared but not proven" (see [1][2]).

I believe using the word "alleged" implies falsehood in this context and is not WP:NPOV: Just because she claims it doesn't make it true or false, so why add the word "alleged" behind what she claims unless it's demonstrably false?

I don't believe it is demonstrably false, as other Wikipedia articles do have cited sources for the statement that "Biological sex differences in humans impact performance in sports" (see Transgender_people_in_sports#Testosterone,_athletic_ability_and_injury_risks). That being said, if neutral language is used, the truth or falsehood of her statement should be irrelevant. The point of the sentence is why she entered the debate, not whether she was right or wrong.

I'd like to rephrase this sentence in a way that does not imply her position as being either factually correct or incorrect.

Here are some alternative wordings:

"In 2019, Davies entered the debate about the participation by trans women in female sporting competitions, opposing such participation, citing a biological advantage trans women hold in sports." (reverted- and fair enough as I agree that "citing" improperly implies she had a source)
"In 2019, Davies entered the debate about the participation by trans women in female sporting competitions, opposing such participation, claiming that trans women hold a biological advantage in sports."
"In 2019, Davies entered the debate about the participation by trans women in female sporting competitions, opposing such participation, stating that the "Growing up male will give transgender athletes a lifelong edge that simply cannot be fully negated by a period of testosterone suppression" [3]"

I prefer #2, since she entered the debate prior to the letter cited in #3. As such I will change to #2. If it gets reverted again, I hope that reversion will come along with productive discussion here, with a view to consensus. -Frazzydee|✍ 05:59, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think your choice of #2 is a good compromise, and you make a good case for why "alleged" is inappropriate

As you point out there is another wikipedia article that goes into the details of the evidence. Which is one reason why I think we should avoid implying any factual claims here - it would be a duplication of effort. Firstly because if new research is published, there would be two articles to update instead of one. Secondly because there is nuance to the question which would take some work to write out and maintain in the face of hostile edits from either side (for example, there is a question of whether physical characteristics like bone density and grip strength translate into a genuine advantage in every sport). Better to keep it short and non-controversial imo 2A00:23C6:2A8F:DE01:B5A0:7675:C6E5:7064 (talk) 19:35, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Changed it to said from claimed, per MOS:SAID. Solipsism 101 (talk) 17:45, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. -Frazzydee|✍ 03:58, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Olympic Appearances

The given link doesn't support the claim of 12 Olympic appearances. 2A02:C7C:5A9C:1B00:A03F:56B1:4A58:ED77 (talk) 21:49, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[1] ttp://www.channel4.com/programmes/celebrity-island-with-bear-grylls

[1]