Talk:Shahzada (Guantanamo Bay detainee 952)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Replaced transcluded image with inline image - {{npov}} tag as per dispute on Template talk:Combatant Status Review Tribunal trailer image and caption
[edit]Replaced transcluded image with inline image - {{npov}} tag as per dispute on Template talk:Combatant Status Review Tribunal trailer image and caption. Geo Swan 12:58, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
clarification please?
[edit]I asked for clarification of the placement of an {{unreferenced}} tag on this article on the talk page of the wikipedian who placed it.
Cheers! Geo Swan (talk) 13:26, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
- I have answered your post on my talk page. What I meant was that the section is filled with statements that take a particular point of view but are not footnoted so the reader does not know where to look to verify whether these statements are true or not, per WP:V and WP:RS. Also, you need unbiased multiple sources for controversial statements. An encyclopedia should not depend on one source for information in an article. I changed the template to, hopefully, more correctly reflect my concerns. Regards, Mattisse 15:03, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
move
[edit]I suggest to move the article to Haji Shahzada. Following the secondary sources ([1], [2]) and others. Haji is unlikely a honorific in the case of this individual. There are no sources or references that say it is an honorific and even if it would be it should be included into name as all sources that i know refers to this individual as Haji Shahzada so that we have to include it according to our policies. IQinn (talk) 13:10, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Shahzada (Guantanamo Bay detainee 952). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070930184542/http://cageprisoners.com/articles.php?aid=3838 to http://cageprisoners.com/articles.php?aid=3838
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070929123416/http://www.defenselink.mil/transcripts/transcript.aspx?transcriptid=3902 to http://www.defenselink.mil/transcripts/transcript.aspx?transcriptid=3902
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071214103614/http://www.dod.mil/pubs/foi/detainees/csrt_arb/000600-000699.pdf to http://www.dod.mil/pubs/foi/detainees/csrt_arb/000600-000699.pdf
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.theage.com.au/news/World/US-releases-Guantanamo-files/2006/04/04/1143916500334.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:28, 7 November 2017 (UTC)