Talk:Shō Hashi/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nominator: Generalissima (talk · contribs) 19:54, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Borsoka (talk · contribs) 05:43, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it well written?
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
- C. It contains no original research:
- D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- Is it neutral?
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- Is it stable?
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
Remarks
- Some background to the small kingdoms and their relationship with each other and China could be helpful (not more than two or three sentences).
- Done. - G
- Introduce the Ryukyu Kingdom as an island nation in the West Pacific.
- Done. - G
- Introduce Kyushu as an island.
- Done. - G
- Link and introduce Okinawa as an island.
- Done. - G
- Introduce Kyuyo.
- Done. - G
- Explain gusuko with one or two words.
- Done. - G
- Introduce and link Chuzan.
- Done. - G
- Bunei, the king of Chūzan, had several men castrated and sent to serve as eunuchs in the court of the Yongle Emperor in 1406. The emperor reacted poorly to this, ordering them returned and stating that it was intolerable that innocent men should be subjected to such treatment. Relevant? If yes,
- Make it clear the the Yongle Emperor ruled China.
- Relevant since its what made him lose favor of the emperor; but clarified. - G
- ...ordering them returned... Is this grammatical?
- Rephrased. - G
Borsoka (talk) 05:52, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
- What does a longevity adviser?
- Elaborated. - G
- Introduce the Ming Veritable Reports.
- Done. - G
- ...Ming Veritable Records record... Rephrase.
- Done. - G
- Explain aji with one or two words.
- Done. - G
- Introduce Yomitanzan and I doubt he was a castle (as the links suggests).
- Made this sentence more clear. - G
- Sanzan kingdoms?
- Elaborated. - G
- Introduce Hashiman. Borsoka (talk) 07:37, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
- Done. - G
@Borsoka: Okay! Got to everything here. Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 19:12, 12 December 2024 (UTC)