Talk:Sex offender/GA1

GA Review

Unsuccessful. PARAKANYAA (talk) 02:56, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Absolutiva (talk · contribs) 23:05, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: PARAKANYAA (talk · contribs) 02:56, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am quickfailing this on the grounds that the article has active maintenance tags, particularly the "globalize" tag. I agree with the placement of this tag as this is very United States based which is inappropriate for a broad article.

BROAD - I also doubt this passes the broadness criteria, as this is cited to a fairly small collection of not particularly high quality articles, when this is a very broad topic. This is in addition to individual reports, dubious sources like HuffPost and other news articles which are not good sources for this topic (too specific to individual cases). Generally this is a high level article and should be citing broader sources. Several of the citations are broken. There's also lots of uncited information.

NPOV - Critical Criminology tends to be a fairly fringe area of the field so I would be hesitant in giving sources of that type as much weight as this article currently does, failing NPOV. The "controversy" section makes this worse. I could dig in more to issues I see as I see more the more I look but this requires a lot of change to even approach the GA criteria. PARAKANYAA (talk) 02:56, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.