Jump to content

Talk:Sericulture

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: Glynis sim.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 08:59, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

[edit]

Why are the dollar amounts in this article in rupees? 70.250.218.236 (talk) 20:57, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

cruelty

[edit]

Though I'm sure being steamed alive is horrible (though I'm not sure how much they can feel, real tiny brains), evolutionarily the cultivation of the silk worm has been a great hit. would they spread their genes to that extent any other way? Some of their young die, which would happen anyway in the wild, in exchange they get to be fed and get to bread. Symbioses. I wonder if cultures who eat silk worms eat the works killed in the silk making process. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 167.206.189.6 (talk) 21:27, 13 April 2011 (UTC) In response to your question, I have deleted the link to silkworms having to construct cocoons without natural recourse to 3D space, being forced to live in 2D space with limited constraints. A sadistic experiment and a disgusting link posted to Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:C23:744E:A200:2192:E883:A90F:49B5 (talk) 00:44, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Editorial Commentary Aimed at Gandhi

[edit]

While true, the sentence, "The machines lead to injury, diseases and death of humans instead of silkworms" is editorial and misses the mark of NPOV. (98.171.169.19 (talk) 03:22, 1 March 2015 (UTC))[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Sericulture. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Many of the above links you posted are dead. Please remove them, if they are no longer relevant or correct. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:C23:744E:A200:2192:E883:A90F:49B5 (talk) 00:54, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:28, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Sericulture. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:24, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

History

[edit]

An edit [1] by User:Glynis sim needs to be integrated into the 'History' section and the lead/lede re-written to suit.SovalValtos (talk) 00:31, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Sericulture. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:08, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed Spelling again

[edit]

I have fixed the spelling of the captions beneath the images twice now. Please do not break the spelling again. Here is some information about rotary mountages. A montage is a series of things, a mountage is a thing for mounting things onto, such as silk, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/291647290_Rotary_mountage_and_its_advantages I hope you have a nice day. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Psypherium (talk • contribs) 02:27, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

silk pavilion video

[edit]

I think it should be removed. It's definitely a neat art video, but it's not necessary. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.83.180.11 (talk) 18:50, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Peace Silk

[edit]

The article states that "peace silk is superior to regular silk" without giving an explination of why it is quote unquote superior. Presumably it's due to the lack of injury to the silkworms, but if that's the case then the article should clearly say that. Also, and this may just be my opinion, I do think that that section does miss the mark of NPOV at points, though I might be wrong — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.92.190.170 (talk) 11:35, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Sericulture&oldid=1195043931"