Talk:Securing Adolescents from Exploitation-Online Act of 2007

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

NPOV tag

User:Jamesontai tagged the article for NPOV a few minutes after it was created, arguing that "although it is factual, it seems as this article's creation had a political agenda". However, a neutral point of view doesn't have to do with assumed intent, but with the content. I will thus remove the tag. Terjen (talk) 20:35, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You generally want to ask the user who tagged the article before removing it. I'm putting the article back up and I stand by my comment. Through your numerous edits I find NPOV issues still and I still believe that the article's creation may be politically driven, so unless you can prove otherwise... - Jameson L. Tai ^{talk ♦ contribs} 22:21, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You ask me to prove a negative, regarding my political intent no less. Let's stick to the factual content. Terjen (talk) 22:56, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Obviously it is politically driven, as are most edits related to political articles. Had Ron Paul voted for it, this probably would have remained a red link for longer. That doesn't mean we can't forget about how the article started and focus on improving it. — BRIAN0918 • 2007-12-07 14:42Z

What is meant by "no moving of the page will get rid of that NPOV tag that easily"? I thought the key NPOV problem was the implication that anyone and everyone hosting a wifi needs to monitor activity, when there is no such requirement. Regardless of the reasons why the article was created, it no longer appears to be biased toward one point of view. It's more of a dictionary definition than a substantial article. I don't think the {{NPOV}} tag is necessary. — BRIAN0918 • 2007-12-07 17:44Z

Room for Improvement

Putting the bill's text into the article.
Placing arguments for and against the bill while keeping WP:NPOV
Reasons why the two reps voted against the bill.

- Jameson L. Tai ^{talk ♦ contribs} 22:24, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reasons why the 409 reps voted for the bill.

— BRIAN0918 • 2007-12-07 14:39Z