Talk:Secret trust

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Death Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Stub

Apologies for posting this article in "stubby" form. The redlinks were really starting to bother me, so I put something down. I will try and roll this out into something more substantive in the near future. Legis 11:47, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ANachronism?

I disagree with the assertion that secret trusts are an anachronism. Just because the use of a device is rare doesn't mean that it is an anachronism.

Secret trusts can be useful indeed - publicity in many instances is unwanted. Further, the testator may wish to change their mind. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.24.162.62 (talk) 23:35, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]