Talk:Schmallenberg orthobunyavirus

Viruses Low‑importance

	Viruses portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Viruses, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of viruses on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirusesWikipedia:WikiProject VirusesTemplate:WikiProject Virusesvirus
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Veterinary medicine Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Veterinary medicine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Veterinary medicine on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Veterinary medicineWikipedia:WikiProject Veterinary medicineTemplate:WikiProject Veterinary medicineVeterinary medicine
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Distribution map not understandable by color blind users

The information in the distribution map apparently relies on distinguishing red and green hues that are not distinct to people with colour blindness. I will add the article to the relevant hidden category. Fortunately, the information is also included in the wording of the body text.

Frans Fowler (talk) 07:10, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

First visualization of Schmallenberg virus

“The recordings are made in the media interest in high definition from the Press Office of the FLI available.” http://www.fli.bund.de/de/startseite/press-releases/presse-informationsseite/Pressemitteilung/schmallenberg-virus-erstmals-sichtbar-gemacht.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.226.24.6 (talk) 11:29, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relation to Akabane virus?

Afaics it was originally believed to be Akabane virus - did that change? Otherwise it should be mentioned in the article. -- Richiez (talk) 12:57, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Symptoms in animals?

Should this not be signs rather than symptoms? Moletrouser (talk) 07:04, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Threat to human health

This sentence "A risk assessment in December 2011 did not consider it likely to be a threat to human health, as other comparable viruses are not zoonotic." does not make sense. The first reference cited in this sentence (link does not work, but this should be the link https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/media/en/publications/Publications/231112_TER_Risk_assessment_Schmallenberg_virus.pdf) states "the new virus is closest to the following Simbu serogroup viruses: Shamonda-, Aino- and Akabane-viruses, which do not cause disease in humans." Suggest to modify into: "A risk assessment in December 2011 did not consider it likely to be a threat to human health, as other closely related viruses do not cause disease in humans." 165.85.72.164 (talk) 12:47, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]