Talk:Schmücke dich, o liebe Seele, BWV 180

Schmücke dich, o liebe Seele, BWV 180 has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: October 31, 2015. (Reviewed version).

A fact from Schmücke dich, o liebe Seele, BWV 180 appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 10 November 2011 (check views). A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2011/November. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Schmücke dich, o liebe Seele, BWV 180.

Wikipedia

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Classical music: Compositions

	Classical music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music
	This article is supported by Compositions task force.

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on October 22, 2024.

Like a Gigue??

I can't agree that the first movement, a chorale, is "like a gigue". Gardner describes it as a procession. Mincham as a fantasia. Calling this graceful piece "a gigue" does disservice to both the cantata and a gigue! Delmlsfan (talk) 23:28, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You don't have to agree with Dürr, who says so, which is now in the article, together with Gardiners (different) view. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 23:35, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Schmücke dich, o liebe Seele, BWV 180/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Khazar2 (talk · contribs) 17:02, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'll be glad to take this review. Bear with me--I'm a little out of practice. Comments to follow in 2-4 days. Thanks in advance for your work on it! -- Khazar2 (talk) 17:02, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	Excellently written. I've made a few small copyedits as I went; please doublecheck to make sure I haven't accidentally introduced an error myself.
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).	Well sourced for all interpretative claims
	2c. it contains no original research.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.	Evaluative statements are all clearly cited to critics.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.	No evidence of edit-warring
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
	y. .	Pass--congratulations!

Movement 7 Wind Scoring

In the "Structure and Scoring" section, the winds listed for the final movement is "2Ob Ot" but there is no information about what Ot represents and there is certainly no such thing as a Transverse Oboe. Is this a typo for "Ft 2Ob"? Guillaime (talk) 16:30, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good question! - I found no information, so removed it. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:15, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I checked the scores (both Bach Gesellschaft Ausgabe and Neue Bach-Ausgabe) on IMSLP and found it should be full orchestral forces for the final choral which would be the usual practice. I have made the change (2Fl 2Ob) to the article. Guillaime (talk) 18:24, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]