Talk:Scenic route

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Scenic route article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article was nominated for deletion on 12 December 2008 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Travel and Tourism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of travel and tourism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Travel and TourismWikipedia:WikiProject Travel and TourismTemplate:WikiProject Travel and TourismTourism
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Highways Low‑importance

	Roads portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Highways, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of highways on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HighwaysWikipedia:WikiProject HighwaysTemplate:WikiProject HighwaysHighways
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merge tourist highway into this article

I say, let's do it, for the reasons discussed at the December 2008 deletion request. --Triadian (talk) 22:50, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose merger. A tourist route is not necessarily scenic, but may be constructed as a bypass to excessive urban traffic. Hadrianheugh (talk) 15:22, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

1. This artice is US centric and low quality
2. This article is a roads, not a highway topic
3. There are many tourist routes around the world that are both scenic and designated tourist routes
4. Needs renaming to US scenic routes and kept as US designated routes, or globalise and improve
5. Theme routes is insufficiently explored and should be a separate article.

satusuro 15:07, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]