This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rocketry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of rocketry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RocketryWikipedia:WikiProject RocketryTemplate:WikiProject RocketryRocketry
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom
This article claims that the main reason this aircraft was cancelled was because of bribery. In the early fifties there were several hybrid rocket/turbojet aircraft and all of them were cancelled. This suggests that such hybrids are not cost effective and would have been cancelled regardless of any bribes paid.68.149.247.130 (talk) 22:51, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
There is a pretty clear chain of events linking bribery and the cancellation of the SR.177. It might have been cancelled anyway - the '57 Sandys paper was hard on all UK manned aircraft projects, even without considering the technical aspects of hybrid propulsion. We can't say that it wouldn't have been cancelled without the Starfighter, but certainly we should still include the Lockheed bribery as relevant and well-sourced. Andy Dingley (talk) 09:08, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I did not remove anything that was sourced - I removed a biased rambling added by an IP from the Lead. I'm sure we can write something better that is actually based on the sources. - BilCat (talk) 16:01, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
There's a programme on YouTube about the SR.177 here: [1] - it was developed because the SR.53 was not capable of carrying AI radar.