This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women
This article was created or improved as part of the Women in Red project. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red
Hi Grnrchst -- as requested, here is a quick 20-minute assessment from WP Women in Green to help prepare the article for a full GA review. Ismailova sounds like an interesting filmmaker! With a few tweaks, I think the article is well on its way toward meeting GA criteria. I've listed a few comments and suggestions below:
The lead section could use expansion: add the year of birth and summarize Ismailova's most significant major works, films or prizes.
I'm noticing some repetitive phrasing around years and dates (e.g., "In 2013, this thing happened...", "In 2017, this other thing happened..."). You may want to vary some of that phrasing to make it a smoother read.
Are there any reviews/critiques of specific films or exhibits, especially the big ones like Zukhra or 40 Days of Silence? I can see that Ismailova has a substantial body of work, but there isn't much description of how those works have been received by audiences or critics.
In the Biography section, I'm seeing some potentially over-cited sentences -- for example, the simple claim that The Haunted was about the Turan tiger is backed up by five different sources. While not technically incorrect, I think it can make the text look a bit cluttered and hard to read. For BLP articles, my understanding is that claims only need to be backed up by multiple refs/citations if they are contentious claims (or if you're concerned about the breadth or quality of a single source).
I note that the subject of the article (User:Saodatismailova) has apparently edited a couple of things here herself. I would recommend double-checking those edits and just making sure that no inaccurate or uncited info may have been added, however well-intentioned. As a suggestion, you may also want to leave a talk page message for Saodatismailova to explain best practices for article subjects to flag errors or request edits, in order to avoid any conflict of interest issues in future.
.svg){kind=small}
