The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
This article was accepted on 3 September 2014 by reviewer Timtrent (talk·contribs).
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment
This article is within the scope of WikiProject South Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of South Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject South AfricaTemplate:WikiProject South AfricaSouth Africa
I am about to accept this version of the draft as an article. However, I am accepting it based upon the fact that, while it is most definitely notable, the notability is barely asserted in the draft, thus needs both better assertion and far better referencing. Main article space is better to achieve this for this article than the draft namespace.
Some of the references are regurgitated press releases. They need to be replaced, as does the reference that is simply a passing mention. We need far better quality of referencing. We require references from significant coverage about the entity, and independent of it, and in WP:RS please. See WP:42.
In addition, the references are all dumped at the end. Since I appreciate this is written initially by a novice author I recommend the reading of WP:REFB and WP:CITE. While citations are not mandatory they are highly desirable and make life far more interesting for our readership. FiddleFaddle11:49, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
