Talk:Sandugo

Sandugo has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
December 17, 2006	Good article nominee	Listed
February 12, 2009	Good article reassessment	Kept

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on November 24, 2006.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that the Sandugo or Blood Compact, where two people drink a small amount of each other's blood, was a traditional way to formalize treaties of friendship in the Philippines?

Current status: Good article

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Spain Mid‑importance

	Spain portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpainWikipedia:WikiProject SpainTemplate:WikiProject SpainSpain
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tambayan Philippines High‑importance

	Philippines portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the Philippines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tambayan PhilippinesWikipedia:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesTemplate:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesPhilippine-related
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

welcome comments, edits, images

Your comments, edits, images, etc. to improve the article Sandugo are most welcome!--Pinay06 10:27, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know

...that the Sandugo or Blood Compact, where two people drink a small amount of each other's blood, was a traditional way to formalize treaties of friendship in the Philippines?

Submitted to: "Did you know?" talk page November 24, 2006

Is it just Filipino?

The blood pact is a staple feature in many Chinese kung-fu movies. Borisblue 07:09, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the info. It's appreciated. It is not within the scope of the article, though.--Pinay06 06:59, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If someone does an article about the history of blood compacts the world over and its significance among different cultures, I'm sure that information would be important. That information however is outside the scope of this article but if the general blood compact article is ever created, I'm sure this article would then be noted to signify one of the more famous blood compacts in history. PhilipDM 19:15, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

love this article

i really like this article. but i'm hoping there are citations from on-line sources for further reading, because i don't have the resources to buy those books.RebSkii 06:50, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Your suggestion is considered. --Pinay06 07:01, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

i think the content of the footnote section should be put in the references section. that's why i previously asked for online sources, because when i first saw this article,i just read the paragraphs i didn't notice that there are on-line citations. footnotes are supposed to be explanatory or clarificatory in nature. my best regards!
-- RebSkii 20:04, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Done! Thanks.--Pinay06 18:02, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A suggestion

I came by from the GA page and wanted to say that, as a person who'd never heard of the sandugo before, the first sentence of the article was a little hard for me to understand. It reads more of a description of what the sandugo was like and less what it is. For me it would make more sense if it were something more like "The Sandugo was a blood compact, performed in native Bohol style, which was made between the traveling Spanish explorer Miguel (etc) and Datu Sikatuna (etc) in 1565." I also think moving that memorial plaque up towards the top of the article would be a good idea.

-- best, Katsam 12:15, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article

I find that this article meets the good article criteria. It is well-written, well-sourced and cited, makes good use of images, and covers its topic broadly and in significant depth. Some further copyediting to tighten up the prose might be possible. PhilipDM 21:40, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Start of slavery

Unfortunately for the pinoys that this is the start of slavery for the whole archeapelago. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Davanitz (talk • contribs) 07:38, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA Reassessment

This discussion is transcluded from Talk:Sandugo/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.

This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force in an effort to ensure all listed Good articles continue to meet the Good article criteria. In reviewing the article, I have found that this article has some issues that need to be urgently addressed.

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):

The prose is poor, perhaps 5/10. The biggest problem I noticed is "with the fate of Magellan at the back of his mind". How can we possibly know that?

Commenting with regard to how we could possibly know that: The direct quote from the cited supporting source would read, "... with the fate of Magellan certainly on the back of his mind." It looks like this cited supporting source might have embellished the facts here, putting their reliability into question. -- Boracay Bill (talk) 04:19, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In that case, the phrase should either be quoted and attributed, or rephrased.--Jackyd101 (talk) 10:04, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

A hidden note in the text indicates that the symbolism section or parts of it are copyright violations. This needs to be investigated and sorted out. In any case, the section is confusing and needs to be urgently rewritten so that it makes more sense. In addition, the references are not always properly formatted and should come immediately after punctuation.--Jackyd101 (talk) 09:54, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
a (fair representation): b (all significant views):

See problems with symbolism section

It is stable.
It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
a (tagged and captioned): b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA): c (non-free images have fair use rationales):
Overall:
a Pass/Fail:

I will check back in no less than seven days. If progress is being made, the article will remain listed as a Good article. Otherwise, it may be delisted (such a decision may be challenged through WP:GAR). If improved after it has been delisted, it may be nominated at WP:GAN again. Feel free to drop a message on my talk page if you have any questions, and many thanks for all the hard work that has gone into this article thus far. (If you are really busy, let me know and I'll give more time. I need to know however so I can see that someone is interested in addressing these concerns.) Regards--Jackyd101 (talk) 09:54, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nice work, I think I can confirm this article as a GA.--Jackyd101 (talk) 18:23, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Sandugo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 09:32, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Sandugo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 16:37, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Blood Compact Bohol.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:42, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]