Talk:San Marino in the Eurovision Song Contest 2024/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Grk1011 (talk · contribs) 20:37, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Riley1012 (talk · contribs) 01:32, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again! I saw this article needs a GAR to maintain San Marino in the Eurovision Song Contest's good topic status, so I will take this on. -Riley1012 (talk) 01:32, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

1. Well-written

It placed 14th out of the 16 participating countries in its semi-final, and received 16 points total Comma not needed after "semi-final"
...San Marino qualified for the final for its second time... I think "for the second time" makes more sense
...and one semi-final reserved to Sammarinese nationals.. Change to "reserved for"
...where 129 entries qualified to the semi-finals... Change to "for the semi-finals"
There were no restrictions on the nationality of the performer nor the language of the song. Should be "or" instead of "nor" here
...one finalist was selected from each semi-final and four acts Add a comma after "semi-final"
...with a further three artists advancing to the final. The phrasing here is awkward, change to "with three more artists advancing..."
...who had previous staged the performance for Spain in the 2023 junior contest. Should be "previously"
The list of jury members in the Detailed voting results sub-section doesn't need to be there because you already listed the members in the first paragraph of the Voting section.

2. Verifiable
Passes Earwig's. Spot check: 2 and 3, 5, 11, 18, 25, 28, 36, 42, 50, 55, 59, 67, 74. All fine.

In addition to the regular selection process, SMRTV also launched a collaboration with London-based music tech startup Casperaki, named The San Marino Sessions, to determine an additional finalist. Source?
The country was not announced among the top 10 entries in the semi-final and therefore failed to qualify to compete in the final. Source?
...written by Isra Dante Ramos, Solomando, Roberto la Lueta Ruiz and Sara Jiménez Moral. Source?
The Instagram post for ref. 43 appears to have been removed. But also, is there a better source that can be used?
Refs. 7 and 14 are the same link and should be just one citation, same for refs. 12 and 16.
Refs. 7 and 24 are dead links

3. Broad
The article addressed the main aspects and is focused.

4. Neutral
No concerns regarding neutrality.

5. Stable
The article is stable.

6. Illustrated
The images used are in the public domain, are relevant, and have suitable captions.

@Grk1011: I am done with the initial review, and my suggestions are in the bullet points. -Riley1012 (talk) 15:01, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]