Talk:Sam Liccardo

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

This page is about a politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. For that reason, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

California: San Francisco Bay Area Mid‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	San Francisco Bay Area portal This article is supported by San Francisco Bay Area task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Politics: American Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by American politics task force (assessed as Low-importance).

United States: Latin and Hispanic heritage / Mexican-Americans

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	Hispanic and Latino Americans portal This article is supported by WikiProject Latin and Hispanic heritage (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by the Mexican-American task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

U.S. Congress Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is about one (or many) person(s).

This article has been mentioned by multiple media organizations:

Staff (October 26, 2013). "WIKIPEDIA STRIPS PAGE FROM SAN JOSE COUNCILMAN". San Jose Mercury News.
Howey, Brian and Nguyen, Tran (2023-01-04). "Disgraced eBay exec wielded power at San Jose City Hall". San Jose Spotlight. Wymer attended meetings with Liccardo and his senior staff and helped rewrite the mayor's Wikipedia page, the emails show.{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)

Endorsements

Anyone want to weigh in on the appropriateness of listing election endorsements? JGriffithSV (talk) 17:51, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Personal Life

I came across this article, including a read of its section on "Personal Life." It really must try harder than this. It's so hokey, its laughable. Hokum should not find its way into an article. This article is about the Mayor of the 10 largest city in the U.S., it could do a lot better. Ca.papavero (talk) 08:01, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Agree, homey/hokey tone was inappropriate, plus it was unreferenced so I just deleted the section. Brianhe (talk) 15:51, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV

This article seems to be largely biased towards Liccardo (for instance, I have already removed the latter part of the sentence sentence "Taking office at the age of 44, Licardo became one of the youngest mayors in the city’s modern history, but in his brief tenure, San Jose has already surged." The entire bulleted list seems extensively biased towards Liccardo. MB298 (talk) 01:55, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Update: Much of the disputed content seems to have been added by User:Lrdcmdtarley, who has a single contribution. MB298 (talk) 02:03, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Although it's been eight years since these previous comments were written, a great deal of the article still contains biased language. I think it needs to be noted that one news agency has reported that Sam Liccardo had his senior staff write and edit this article, according to city emails they acquired through a Freedom of Information Act request, as recently as 2019. BrokeBoneGrinder (talk) 18:53, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Heritage

I just reverted an edit that labeled Liccardo as Hispanic/Latino. I based it on this article:

https://www.mercurynews.com/2014/09/28/herhold-sam-liccardos-roots-go-back-to-the-beginning-of-california/

It clearly labels him as mostly Italian/Scottish. But in re-reading the article and the references to his lineage going back to Ortega, now I'm not so sure. I can't tell if I'm correct or if I'm confused by a badly-written article. Having someone else weigh in would be useful. JGriffithSV (talk) 21:37, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Liccardo's mother's maiden name is Aceves, a Mexican name, and the Aceves family immigrated from Mexico in the 1860's. In addition, Ortega (another ancestor of Hispanic lineage) was born in what was today Mexico, as were several generations of his ancestors, although ruled by Spain at the time. 2601:646:8E00:A090:7199:56B9:95EF:B417 (talk) 16:22, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Any sources for this info that we can put in the article? Elysdir (talk) 07:05, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Article improvements

WP:RSEDITORIAL: There are quite a lot of editorials and op-eds used as sources for this article, which aren't necessarily reliable sources.
WP:OVERCITE: There are quite a lot of citations in general, and in many cases multiple articles on the same topic from different outlets.
The article's sections are overly-nested. The "political career" heading can be removed and the city council and mayor sections can be elevated to the top level. The mayor section is a mess right now; I think it could be improved by having a short lede about the 2014 and 2018 elections and then subsections organized by topic.
Some of the topics in the mayor section seem overly detailed and could probably be trimmed down.

Sjedits (talk) 11:28, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

2024 Congressional Election

We need a more neutral administrator type to review that entire section. I have a lot of problems with this content. First, it reads like a news article, trying to present the latest day-to-day information in an ongoing event, and Wikipedia isn't a news article. Second, the FEC complaint doesn't warrant mention. FEC complaints are a dime a dozen, and right now, it's simply an allegation (and one that's most definitely politically motivated). This whole section seems way too loaded, and way too long to boot. JGriffithSV (talk) 01:33, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]