Jump to content

Talk:Salt Pit

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

This article needs citations badly.——Preceding unsigned comment added by Blackberrylaw (talk • contribs) 2005 October 23, 16:14

!!

[edit]

i second that. article needs dates and info as in from where was this article info recieved.——Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.205.77.254 (talk • contribs) 2005 November 28, 00:23

Agreed. It also needs to be checked for neutral point of view. I'm not fond of torture or "death in custody" situations, personally, and this is sickening to me. Still, Wikipedia isn't a forum for personal viewpoints. The phrasing of statements regarding the "bright and eager" CIA case officer involved seems biased to me. Anyone else feel the same way?
P.S.: Hyperlinks need to be added to that same section. I'm not touching that until this is resolved, though.Moonsword 02:13, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Both the Washington Post and the Bostom Globe quoted colleagues of the CIA officers using the phrase "bright and eager" while describing him.
The article does have an external links section. You realize that if you felt the wikipedia article was insufficiently detailed you could have read the external links? And, if you were so inclined, you could have added those details yourself. -- Geo Swan 03:32, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
It's not the "bright and eager" part I'm referring to. That part was cited for clarity on what I was referencing, not the characterization itself. Bad writing on my part. Sorry.I didn't take a close enough look at the links and (mistakenly) thought they didn't refer to that section. The request for hyperlinks was meant for references inside Wikipedia, btw. Anyway, I'm looking up the details now to edit the page. -- Moonsword 15:48, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, I've changed that section and edited it extensively as well as getting more sources. Better? -- Moonsword 16:19, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Anon has a concern about the satellite photo

[edit]

I thought the Satellite picture was great but it has been DOCTORED UP EVER SO SLIGHTLY!!! Props to whomever did it though because it provides subtle details that make you want to conclude its legit. Look closely, or blow it up on your desktop wall paper as I have. Just below the third building (which looks like the landscape and could possibly be an underground structure there) there are a series of parallel stripes that were added to soften the landscape as if there were mysterious tire tracks and such through the hard-packed dirt landscape.——Preceding unsigned comment added by 161.32.217.190 (talk • contribs) , 2007 April 17, 02:20

Reason for the name change?

[edit]

I think the name change, from "the salt pit" to plain old "salt pit", was a mistake. I am going to ask the person who made the change to provide an explanation here. If they don't, or if others join me in agreeing it is a mistake, I am going to request a restoration of the original name.

Cheers! -- Geo Swan 01:58, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

@Geo Swan: I just found this article since I came across testimony about this place. I completely agree about the name as it could easily be misinterpreted as an article about entities similar to salt mines. Anyway, just wanted to know if you had any luck with the above. Curious if someone provided resistance, a good reason for this, or you moved onto other things (totally reasonable). Diablanco (talk) 02:37, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

fix references -- see talk

[edit]

It is essential that references include the title, author, publisher, date published -- because links go dead.

If the person who placed the reference doesn't include the title, author, publisher and date published, they make it impossible for later editors to search for mirrors, or similar articles that could serve as a replacement.

The references here once did include author, publisher and date published. Someone stripped that information, for some reason. Please don't do that!

Several of the links pointed to the same 2005/3/5 article by Dana Priest, but in two different publications. That was a mistake.

Please always include the title, author, publisher and date published.

Cheers! Geo Swan 16:42, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sections

[edit]

I changed the section format but was wondering how the November date applied? It says October 29 and he was dead the next day? Did I miss something? Cleanelephant (talk) 21:06, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There hasn't been an update to the date confusion yet on this article. The dates are made clear in the main article of Gul Rahman. Updating it here as well. Tunkki-1970 (talk) 12:47, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merge

[edit]

Dark prison should be merged into this article! After the Senate Intelligence Committee’s report it is clear that this the same site.Olegwiki (talk) 22:10, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Salt Pit. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:12, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wayback machine claims to not have archived this page. Both links are broken. Tunkki-1970 (talk) 14:57, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Salt Pit. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:29, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"In the winter of 2005, the Salt Pit became known .."

[edit]

"In the winter of 2005, the Salt Pit became known to the general public because of two incidents. In 2011..." This is not clear. What two incidents? This could be rewritten for clarity. GangofOne (talk) 22:54, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Salt Pit. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:33, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: States and their Secrets

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 24 August 2022 and 14 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Weishahd (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Jadassims (talk) 17:50, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Salt_Pit&oldid=1195304651"