Talk:SQLf
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
The two original sentences in the "semantics" section do not seem to be relevant to the article:
- ″For sake of simplicity in presentation of query semantic we will assume, without loss of generality, single relation
SELECTclause.″ - ″For sake of simplicity in presentation of query semantic we will assume, without loss of generality, single relation
FROMclause.″
Start a discussion about improving the SQLf page
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "SQLf" page.
