Talk:SLAPP Suits/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 23:08, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 23:08, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

Infobox and lead

• Add either the "{{Use mdy dates}}" or "{{Use dmy dates}}" template so the reference dates are consistent.
  •  Done
• The non-free use rationale is in great shape!
  • Well, I stole it from Donald Trump (Last Week Tonight) for the infobox picture and edited it. :) Credit where credit is due to Northamerica1000 (talk · contribs).
• Couldn't find any issues with the infobox.
  • Very noice!
• Lead should include stuff from each section, so add something from #Reaction.
  •  Done

Background

Coal

• Since the first sentence is in part-tense, the rest should be too (ex. "begins" → "began").
  • Assuming you meant past tense, i'll comb through.
    • It should be done now, take a look?

Yeah, looks good now. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 13:56, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

• Even though it's not broken, could you fix the link to Donald Trump?
  •  Done
• Optional, but I suggest changing "..." to "[...]".
  • I'll take it–  Done
• Remove the comma after "ignored this letter".
  •  Done

Lawsuit

• "alleges" → "alleged" (already happened)
  •  Done
• Remove the comma after "part of Murray Energy".
  •  Done

Episode

• In this section, and in others, there are words/events that should be in past-tense since they already happened.
  • I think I fixed that now, but I'm not sure.
• "a negative content" → "negative content"
  •  Done
• Remove the comma after "another lawsuit".
  •  Done
• "in squirrel costume" → "in a squirrel costume"
  • I did "squirrel costumes", because it's a barbershop quartet and therefore multiple people.

Reaction

• This section looks good.

References

• AV Club → The A.V. Club
• "www.youtube.com" → "YouTube"
• "www.thecrimson.com" → The Harvard Crimson
• The A. V. Club → The A.V. Club
• the Guardian → The Guardian
• Archive all archivable sources (either manually or with this tool).
• Optional, but it's helpful to readers to link websites.
• There are some references (ex. #7) that are written with multiple templates such as "Webarchive". Try using the "cite web" template instead.
• Mark references from Los Angeles Times with "|url-access=limited".
• Mark references from Time with "|url-access=limited".
• Mark references from The New York Times with "|url-access=limited".
• Mark references from The Washington Post with "|url-access=registration".
• Mark references from Vulture with "|url-access=limited".
  •  Done Pretty sure I did all of these? I ran IAbot beforehand, and just ran it now, but I think the Webarchive one needs to be checked again.
  • @Some Dude From North Carolina: I'll ping you here, let me know!

@Theleekycauldron: On the topic of the Webarchive reference, I would simply rewrite the citation and add in content, and if its dead, I would mark it as dead. Either way, it's not a major issue, so I will be passing the article. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 13:56, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Thanks so much! theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 16:54, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Progress

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·