Talk:Ruth Archer

Ruth Archer has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: April 7, 2016. (Reviewed version).

A fact from Ruth Archer appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 14 October 2015 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that upon her introduction in 1987, Ruth Archer stood out from the other female characters featured in The Archers as she was a farmer and a feminist?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2015/October. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ruth Archer.

Wikipedia

Soap Operas

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soap Operas, an effort to build consistent guidelines for and improve articles about soap operas and telenovelas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit WikiProject Soap Operas, where you can join the project and/or the discussion.Soap OperasWikipedia:WikiProject Soap OperasTemplate:WikiProject Soap Operassoap opera articles

Fictional characters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

Radio: UK Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Radio-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RadioWikipedia:WikiProject RadioTemplate:WikiProject RadioRadio articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This page is within the scope of the UK Radio taskforce. New members are always welcome!

To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Create: Missing years and articles in radio, National Association of Radio Distress-Signalling and Infocommunications (Hungary)
Assess : Unassessed Radio articles; Unknown-importance Radio articles
Cleanup : Radio articles needing attention
Expand : Midweek Politics Bob Crane
Maintain : Portal:Radio
Stubs : Expand: Radio stubs
Verify : Unreferenced BLPs
Other : Collaboration of the Week:
Requests for Radio peer review:

BBC Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the BBC. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the BBC Portal.BBCWikipedia:WikiProject BBCTemplate:WikiProject BBCBBC articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks for WikiProject BBC:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Improve BBC, BBC News (TV channel) and BBC News to Good Article status following previous reviews, create BBC Computer Literacy Project (in light of forthcoming 30th anniversary)
Cleanup : Chucklevision - references and general clean-up, Pebble Mill Studios - over-detailed and long, BBC World Service Television - unreferenced and confusing
Copyedit : BBC News, Broadcasting House
Expand : Top 20 start-class BBC articles with most importance: BBC Japan, BBC World Service Television, BBC Lifestyle, BBC Two Northern Ireland
NPOV : Criticism of the BBC (See comments)
Stubs : Stub-Class BBC articles
Other : *Restructure the category
- Add infoboxes to the BBC articles without infoboxes
- Add free-use images to biographical articles where possible
- Add references to Goa Mix (see assessment) and Coat of arms of the BBC
- Return Dad's Army to a Good article. (See comments)
- Reassess BBC following improvements to article.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Ruth Archer/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Sainsf (talk · contribs) 15:20, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Will review this. Sainsf <^>_{Feel at home} 15:20, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@JuneGloom07: I have added all my comments: Sainsf <^>_{Feel at home} 06:52, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lead

Ruth Archer (previously Pritchard) I think this should read better as "Ruth Archer (née Pritchard)"
- I've changed it to "Ruth Archer (also Pritchard)" as fictional characters are created and not born. There's been a big thing at WP:SOAPS about it, and I believe "also" was the compromise. - JuneGloom07 Talk 02:25, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I assume there is no link for Felicity Finch? Can we add "actress" and her nationality? Done
She made her debut in the 15 July 1987 episode broadcast. I think ""broadcast" may be omitted Done
Can Liz Rigbey be linked? Don't if this is to be a redlink.
- No article I'm afraid. - JuneGloom07 Talk 02:25, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
strong willed Should there not be a dash in between? Done

Creation and casting

Instead of adding the Smethurst citation to the end of each of the first few lines of the section, you can simply add it to the end of the last line it supports.
- I think I've done this right. - JuneGloom07 Talk 02:43, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Can you add who exactly Smethurst is? Author? Critic? Done
Link "love interest" as you have in the lead Done
"Scottish" may be linked Done

Characterisation

"feminist" may be linked Done
authors of The Archers Archives opined "Archives, opined" Done

Marriage to David Archer

and were well suited Should it not be "well-suited"? Done

Breast cancer

I may be good to expand "GP" Done
Can "Chemotherapy" be linked? Done
her system would still contain toxic drugs Wouldn't "body" sound better than "system"? Done

Reception

While Rachel Cooke from the New Statesman was not a fan of the character at all, writing "Ruth bores me to sobs, so I didn't give a fig that this was out of character." I think "while" makes the sentence sound incomplete Done
The last two paras of "Near affair with Sam Batton" may be shifted to Reception, perhaps under a subsection. Done

In popular culture and other media

Can "Rwanda" be linked? Done

That should be all. These done, I would be glad to promote this. Sainsf <^>_{Feel at home} 06:52, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@JuneGloom07: You there? Sainsf <^>_{Feel at home} 13:46, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sainsf, I'm so sorry! I totally missed this. My watchlist has been a little crazy over the past few days and this slipped through the net. I'll start working on it ASAP. - JuneGloom07 Talk 15:53, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Sainsf: Hi, I believe I've worked through all of the points you raised. Thank you for the review and your patience! - JuneGloom07 Talk 02:43, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks JuneGloom07, you have been great in your response. I am sure this splendid article meets all the GA criteria now. Really happy to promote this. Cheers! Sainsf <^>_{Feel at home} 03:56, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ruth Archer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160225064758/https://pugpig.spectator.co.uk/comic/country-shenanigans/ to https://pugpig.spectator.co.uk/comic/country-shenanigans/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:59, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]