This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture
This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places
I created this article and included a reference, which was later deleted with an edit summary asserting the source is unreliable. This is about "prabook", which apparently includes user-generated information. I happen to think it is a bit silly to completely remove the reference, as if to lie about the source. Many sources which include user-generated information, including IMDB, are valid and completely reliable with respect to some information, and less reliable with respect to other info. And as noted in discussion at the RSN noticeboard, prabook is at least valid as a starting point, much like Wikipedia is often regarded as a good starting point. That discussion was archived at Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_211#Prabook_as_user-generated_content. --Doncram (talk) 18:33, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Doncram: It's pretty rough indeed - user-edited, prone to errors, and has an editorial disclaimer. Note that it appears to have the wrong death date.[1][2] Fair to note that those two sources have differing birth dates. Maybe use this[3] to support his brother taking over - although it appears to be a thesis paper? The PCAD entry also supports the masonic temple credit. Didn't want to touch anything while you're in the middle of re-write - will leave to your discretion. Kuru(talk)19:40, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
