Jump to content

Talk:Romero Britto

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

=

[edit]
  • There was originally other content here (though no refs and reasoning), but it was rightly removed by another editor as not suitable for Wikipedia. In any case, the edit request was added afterwards, so it would still require a specific statement of what you wanted to add/remove, why, and any references. Nosebagbear (talk) 00:23, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Heading text

[edit]
=====

Seems Unbiased

[edit]

The page for Britto seems hardly unbiased. In fact, it appears to be more like a form of marketing for Britto rather than information about the fellow. Furthermore, some of the quotes of praise from Britto are taken out of context. This hardly seems like what Wikipedia wants to classify as an encyclopedia entry.

Positivos (talk) 04:04, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pure Marketing

[edit]

I agree with the prior comment. This entry is purely marketing and not at all biography. It should be removed and an objective bio should replace it. It seems that this 'artist' has been very successful financially and the marketing engine is well fueled. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Plethorable (talkcontribs) 18:51, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Zero mention of known works by name

[edit]

Whoever wrote this clearly has a conflict of interest with the topic. NinuKinuski (talk) 13:13, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]