Talk:Roman Quaedvlieg

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography

Australia Low‑importance

	Australia portal Roman Quaedvlieg is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

IP User 120.18.8.241

I have identified several potential issues with 120.18.8.241. They appear to be a Single Purpose Account, and that indicates there may be a Wikipedia: Conflict Of Interest. Finally, the user in question has made an edit summary "you could create a legal problem for yourself" that could be perceived as a Legal Threat. I have requested on the IP Talk page, that the user or users in question advise on that talk page, and this one, if in fact there is a Conflict of Interest. The IP in question is reverting legitimate edits in a way that appears to be non-neutral and replaces sourced content with vague content that downplays what reliable sources have said regarding the subject of the article. Macktheknifeau (talk) 06:16, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]