Talk:Robert Williams (robot fatality)

This article was nominated for deletion on 8 May 2009. The result of the discussion was redirect to Robots#Potential problems.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography

Technology

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology

Invalid redirect

The article no longer mentions Robert Williams. --OpenFuture (talk) 12:57, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kenji Urada article mentions Williams. --Love Krittaya (talk) 09:01, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Restoring article

I've restored this article based on material that was copied into Kenju Urada here by an anonymous editor. I thought it best not to lose the material as it is cited and Williams is mentioned in other articles. It's possible both articles should be merged somewhere.--Cúchullain ^t/c 17:09, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge with Kenji Urada

The assertion of notability is incorrect - it is claimed by the other article and this should redirect to that as a misconception. Widefox; talk 13:59, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to say that they're both independently notable, there's plenty of WP:RS material on both. I see no need to redirect either article.XeroxKleenex (talk) 02:39, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It's been months since this tag was placed, with no further discussion and no consensus to merge anything. I'm removing the tags. XeroxKleenex (talk) 14:48, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It's was not a.i in 1979 just a machine without thinking

I was talking about the accident in 1979.rhere was no intentions to kill today it's getting much better 2605:8D80:6400:C7F9:73EA:81A0:6DCC:4DC5 (talk) 22:35, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]