Talk:Robert Beck (painter)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Robert Beck (painter) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
	This article was accepted from this draft on 7 June 2016 by reviewer Daniel kenneth (talk · contribs).

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

North America

	North America portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject North AmericaNorth America
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Visual arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts

Adding images

Hello. I have just submitted my first Wikipedia entry for review. I have a question - apologies if I should have found the answer in your excellent help areas. I am creating an entry about a painter, and would like to include a few images of his works (he gives copyright consent). My question is: are there guidelines regarding size/how many images it's advisable to use? I have already included his self portrait in the Infobox. Thanks very much. Sue — Preceding unsigned comment added by SueJenkins (talk • contribs) 04:41, 14 May 2016‎ (UTC+9)

Conflict of Interest

Thank you for educating me about COI. I have read the document you kindly suggested. I do know Robert Beck - it's a small and friendly community here in the Delaware Valley. Nonetheless, I have tried to follow guidelines and be objective. It's my first attempt at a Wikipedia entry so I am afraid I am learning as I go. I hope the entry will still be acceptable? Also, I can see that 'Education' has been removed because there is no citation. I am not sure how to provide a citation to prove education. I looked at a few other artists' entries, and they state education without a citation. Grateful for guidance on best way to approach this. Thanks again. Sue — Preceding unsigned comment added by SueJenkins (talk • contribs) 15:35, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

contemporary Ashcan??

SueJenkins: I was looking to disambiguate Ashcan and don't see any relation to Ashcan School of the earlier part of the 20th century, nor do I find any mention of Ashcan or "Contemporary Ashcan" in any of the web-accessible references you've included for the page. Is there a source that substantiates this characterization? —jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 06:56, 20 July 2016 (UTC) I'm having another look at this, as still can't find a source to confirm the use of the epithet...SueJ (talk) 17:59, 24 January 2017 (UTC) I've changed it to 'representational', less colloquial.SueJ (talk) 23:56, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This individual is not notable

This individual is not notable enough to warrant a wikipedia entry, let alone one of this length and detail. This is not a social networking website. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.237.232.13 (talk) 23:34, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree and Beck is notable. K72ndst (talk) 14:06, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Date format

The date format being used throughout the article, including citations, should be consistent per MOS:DATEUNIFY. Moreover, it seems that the "month-day-year" format commonly used in American English should be preferred to the British English format per MOS:DATETIES. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:04, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to update this page

I am currently organizing a retrospective of Robert Beck for the James A. Michener Art Museum for August 2021. There will be a significant catalogue to accompany the show, as well as a book of his essays. Both will be published by the Museum. I am writing the catalogue and editing the essay book. I have been organizing exhibitions and writing catalogues for close to 30 years for institutions such the Library of Congress, the NY Public Library, the Field Museum in Chicago, the V&A in London, among others. I have never contributed to Wikipedia before (although I use it as a reference quite frequently). Would I be considered too close to the subject to write about him? I shouldn't think so, but as I read the page as it is right now, and while I may quibble with words, and would definitely like to expand it, I am unclear about the reference in the tag at the top of the page "A major contributor to this article appears to have a close connection with its subject." While Beck and I are friendly, which is helpful when organizing an exhibition on a living artist, I would not say we are close. At the same time, i don't want to take the time to improve and expand this page, if I am deemed otherwise. What is the criteria? I have also spent a considerable amount time in researching the artist, and have a great collection of reviews and articles, so I can source anything that i write. Again, I am used to this because of writing books and catalogues in the past. I am excited about contributing information to Wikipedia (I already contribute a donation) but would like to do it correctly the first time so I don't spend time creating something that won't meet Wikipedia's standards. Thanks in advance for any advice you can share. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DavidLeopold (talk • contribs) 17:50, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]