Talk:Rob Messenger

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Australia: Queensland / Politics Low‑importance

	Australia portal Rob Messenger is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Queensland (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian politics (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Queensland.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Untitled

I have added the notability template to this article because there doesn't seem to be much notable about the person except for his expose of the Dr Death situation, which although important, I don't believe has enough to warrant an entire article, especially when considering that the same information is presented in the Dr Patel article.

There are also few references in this article.

And finally, there is a distinct POV focus. The majority of this article is about ill feelings from the bundaberg support group. Whatever that is.

This article needs either serious work, by explaining why he is notable (according to WP standards) and rewriting to remove POV, or it needs to be deleted. Klytos 16:16, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The way to handle NPOV is by editing the article to add material from other pts of view; articles are never deleted for not having NPOV; , and members of state and national legislatures are always considered Notable. DGG 22:34, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]