| Discussion Topic |
Replies (estimated) |
Archive Link
|
| comments entered without a section heading |
3 |
Talk:Rind et al. controversy/Archive 1#comments entered without a section heading
|
| Neutrality |
3 |
Talk:Rind et al. controversy/Archive 1#Neutrality
|
| Renaming this Article |
4 |
Talk:Rind et al. controversy/Archive 1#Renaming this Article
|
| Child sexual abuse |
2 |
Talk:Rind et al. controversy/Archive 1#Child sexual abuse
|
| "Importing Criticisms" |
1 |
Talk:Rind et al. controversy/Archive 1#"Importing Criticisms"
|
| A note on balance and NPOV |
1 |
Talk:Rind et al. controversy/Archive 1#A note on balance and NPOV
|
| Reverts |
28 |
Talk:Rind et al. controversy/Archive 1#Reverts
|
| Criticisms section updated |
1 |
Talk:Rind et al. controversy/Archive 1#Criticisms section updated
|
| the 1998 versus 1997 distinction |
1 |
Talk:Rind et al. controversy/Archive 1#the 1998 versus 1997 distinction
|
| Pedophilia/Ephebophilia links in See also |
13 |
Talk:Rind et al. controversy/Archive 1#Pedophilia/Ephebophilia links in See also
|
| Dispute over intro |
1 |
Talk:Rind et al. controversy/Archive 1#Dispute over intro
|
| Controversy section |
1 |
Talk:Rind et al. controversy/Archive 1#Controversy section
|
| WikiProject Pedophilia Article Watch |
40 |
Talk:Rind et al. controversy/Archive 1#WikiProject Pedophilia Article Watch
|
| Renaming the article |
3 |
Talk:Rind et al. controversy/Archive 1#Renaming the article
|
| Lillienfeld-APA controversy |
1 |
Talk:Rind et al. controversy/Archive 1#Lillienfeld-APA controversy
|
| Couple of issues with one para in "Controversy" section |
5 |
Talk:Rind et al. controversy/Archive 1#Couple of issues with one para in "Controversy" section
|
| POV Problems |
2 |
Talk:Rind et al. controversy/Archive 1#POV Problems
|
| odd reference? |
6 |
Talk:Rind et al. controversy/Archive 1#odd reference?
|
| suggested page title change |
5 |
Talk:Rind et al. controversy/Archive 1#suggested page title change
|
| I can only laugh at their conclusion that only 3 out of every 100 individuals in a CSA population have "clinically significant problems" |
1 |
Talk:Rind et al. controversy/Archive 1#I can only laugh at their conclusion that only 3 out of every 100 individuals in a CSA population have "clinically significant problems"
|
| Explain the study |
1 |
Talk:Rind et al. controversy/Archive 1#Explain the study
|
| Archive |
1 |
Talk:Rind et al. controversy/Archive 1#Archive
|
| Dallam |
2 |
Talk:Rind et al. controversy/Archive 1#Dallam
|
| Leadership Council |
6 |
Talk:Rind et al. controversy/Archive 1#Leadership Council
|
| POV discussion |
8 |
Talk:Rind et al. controversy/Archive 1#POV discussion
|
| Logical fallacies |
3 |
Talk:Rind et al. controversy/Archive 1#Logical fallacies
|
| NARTH |
7 |
Talk:Rind et al. controversy/Archive 1#NARTH
|
| Pro-pedophilia |
2 |
Talk:Rind et al. controversy/Archive 1#Pro-pedophilia
|
| Sacred feces |
6 |
Talk:Rind et al. controversy/Archive 1#Sacred feces
|
| Discussion Closed - User Indefinitely Blocked |
6 |
Talk:Rind et al. controversy/Archive 1#Discussion Closed - User Indefinitely Blocked
|
| Reversion of my edit |
4 |
Talk:Rind et al. controversy/Archive 1#Reversion of my edit
|
| MHAMIC |
3 |
Talk:Rind et al. controversy/Archive 1#MHAMIC
|
| Arreola study |
2 |
Talk:Rind et al. controversy/Archive 1#Arreola study
|
| redaction of "The Study's Findings in Brief" section |
13 |
Talk:Rind et al. controversy/Archive 1#redaction of "The Study's Findings in Brief" section
|
| Repetition & neutral point of view; activation of external web-links |
2 |
Talk:Rind et al. controversy/Archive 1#Repetition & neutral point of view; activation of external web-links
|
| NPOV |
2 |
Talk:Rind et al. controversy/Archive 1#NPOV
|
| NPOV |
2 |
Talk:Rind et al. controversy/Archive 1#NPOV 2
|
| The removal of my contributions on December 12th by two anonymous users, 193.169.145.61 and 193.169.145.48 |
6 |
Talk:Rind et al. controversy/Archive 1#The removal of my contributions on December 12th by two anonymous users, 193.169.145.61 and 193.169.145.48
|
| Question for an Administrator: Is activating the dead web-links in the "Usage outside of scholarly discussions" section allowed by Wikepedia policy? |
3 |
Talk:Rind et al. controversy/Archive 1#Question for an Administrator: Is activating the dead web-links in the "Usage outside of scholarly discussions" section allowed by Wikepedia policy?
|
| Question for an Administrator: Is activating the dead web-links in the "Usage outside of scholarly discussions" section allowed by Wikepedia policy? |
3 |
Talk:Rind et al. controversy/Archive 2#Question for an Administrator: Is activating the dead web-links in the "Usage outside of scholarly discussions" section allowed by Wikepedia policy?
|
| Proposing some adjustments to the Introduction (Part B: Discussion of Truthinwriting's Point (5) only. (Cut and Paste from previous section to shorten.) Tentative proposal for the text of the full Introduction. (or WP:Lead) |
17 |
Talk:Rind et al. controversy/Archive 2#Proposing some adjustments to the Introduction (Part B: Discussion of Truthinwriting's Point (5) only. (Cut and Paste from previous section to shorten.) Tentative proposal for the text of the full Introduction. (or WP:Lead)
|
| Proposing some adjustments to the Intro |
34 |
Talk:Rind et al. controversy/Archive 2#Proposing some adjustments to the Intro
|
| Request for balance, for one phrase, found in the 'Findings in brief' Section. Also, non-legal alternative sought for the word "offenses." |
7 |
Talk:Rind et al. controversy/Archive 2#Request for balance, for one phrase, found in the 'Findings in brief' Section. Also, non-legal alternative sought for the word "offenses."
|
| 'Criticism and response': Subsection: Definitions |
2 |
Talk:Rind et al. controversy/Archive 2#'Criticism and response': Subsection: Definitions
|
| TLDR |
9 |
Talk:Rind et al. controversy/Archive 2#TLDR
|
| Sources |
4 |
Talk:Rind et al. controversy/Archive 2#Sources
|
| Discussion of sources |
16 |
Talk:Rind et al. controversy/Archive 3#Discussion of sources
|
| Assertions of bias |
5 |
Talk:Rind et al. controversy/Archive 3#Assertions of bias
|
| WP:ANI posting |
1 |
Talk:Rind et al. controversy/Archive 3#WP:ANI posting
|
| Actionable suggestion |
1 |
Talk:Rind et al. controversy/Archive 3#Actionable suggestion
|
| Dallam et al |
20 |
Talk:Rind et al. controversy/Archive 4#Dallam et al
|
| Consensual, willing, harmless. Reporting this accurately and NPOV |
5 |
Talk:Rind et al. controversy/Archive 3#Consensual, willing, harmless. Reporting this accurately and NPOV
|
| Condemnation of Rind et al. (1998) by State Legislatures & by the U.S. Congress. |
3 |
Talk:Rind et al. controversy/Archive 3#Condemnation of Rind et al. (1998) by State Legislatures & by the U.S. Congress.
|
| Neutrality disputed |
15 |
Talk:Rind et al. controversy/Archive 4#Neutrality disputed
|
| Sockpuppet removed |
11 |
Talk:Rind et al. controversy/Archive 4#Sockpuppet removed
|
| re NAMBLA |
4 |
Talk:Rind et al. controversy/Archive 3#re NAMBLA
|
| First Paragraph of the Controversies Section |
7 |
Talk:Rind et al. controversy/Archive 3#First Paragraph of the Controversies Section
|
| Explain the study. Or break this topic up into 2 separate topics? |
9 |
Talk:Rind et al. controversy/Archive 3#Explain the study. Or break this topic up into 2 separate topics?
|
| BLP NPF |
6 |
Talk:Rind et al. controversy/Archive 3#BLP NPF
|
| Rind, Tromovitch, & Bauserman concluded... |
7 |
Talk:Rind et al. controversy/Archive 3#Rind, Tromovitch, & Bauserman concluded...
|
| Rind et al.'s response to the Congressional Condemnation |
1 |
Talk:Rind et al. controversy/Archive 3#Rind et al.'s response to the Congressional Condemnation
|
| Replication of Rind et al. (1998) by Heather Ulrich. The sentence, mentioning the replication, is at the end of the lead, but has formatting that makes it invisible to the casual reader. |
8 |
Talk:Rind et al. controversy/Archive 3#Replication of Rind et al. (1998) by Heather Ulrich. The sentence, mentioning the replication, is at the end of the lead, but has formatting that makes it invisible to the casual reader.
|
| Should consent be explained? |
10 |
Talk:Rind et al. controversy/Archive 3#Should consent be explained?
|
| Page number & quote if possible |
7 |
Talk:Rind et al. controversy/Archive 3#Page number & quote if possible
|
| Chronology |
3 |
Talk:Rind et al. controversy/Archive 3#Chronology
|
| Popular media documentation of the Rind et al. (1998) controvery. |
1 |
Talk:Rind et al. controversy/Archive 3#Popular media documentation of the Rind et al. (1998) controvery.
|
| December 18th 1998 conference sponsored by the Rev. Hans Visser, Pauluskerk, Rotterdam |
2 |
Talk:Rind et al. controversy/Archive 3#December 18th 1998 conference sponsored by the Rev. Hans Visser, Pauluskerk, Rotterdam
|
| Request for page numbers for the footnote. The full text of the scholarly articles is provided to our WP: editors for this purpose. If 5 words cannot be verified in these 2 secondary sources, I would like to remove those five words from the article. |
23 |
Talk:Rind et al. controversy/Archive 4#Request for page numbers for the footnote. The full text of the scholarly articles is provided to our WP: editors for this purpose. If 5 words cannot be verified in these 2 secondary sources, I would like to remove those five words from the article.
|
| Feel free to add sources |
1 |
Talk:Rind et al. controversy/Archive 3#Feel free to add sources
|
| No personal attacks |
22 |
Talk:Rind et al. controversy/Archive 3#No personal attacks
|
| Lifted out messy section for cleaning |
11 |
Talk:Rind et al. controversy/Archive 4#Lifted out messy section for cleaning
|
| Practice and policy are not in sync on this Talk Page. Proposal for a welcome message. |
6 |
Talk:Rind et al. controversy/Archive 4#Practice and policy are not in sync on this Talk Page. Proposal for a welcome message.
|
| Rind's response to Drs. Holmes and Slap. Pasted here with author permission. |
1 |
Talk:Rind et al. controversy/Archive 4#Rind's response to Drs. Holmes and Slap. Pasted here with author permission.
|
| The Implications |
4 |
Talk:Rind et al. controversy/Archive 4#The Implications
|
| June 2000 Sexuality & Culture |
1 |
Talk:Rind et al. controversy/Archive 4#June 2000 Sexuality & Culture
|
| Minor Typo |
3 |
Talk:Rind et al. controversy/Archive 4#Minor Typo
|
| NARTH and homosexuality |
2 |
Talk:Rind et al. controversy/Archive 4#NARTH and homosexuality
|
| Minor edits suggested |
4 |
Talk:Rind et al. controversy/Archive 4#Minor edits suggested
|
| Introduction remains unclear about Rind's findings and conclusions |
12 |
Talk:Rind et al. controversy/Archive 4#Introduction remains unclear about Rind's findings and conclusions
|
| External links modified |
1 |
Talk:Rind et al. controversy/Archive 4#External links modified
|
| Weight? |
13 |
Talk:Rind et al. controversy/Archive 4#Weight?
|
| "Usage outside of scholarly discussions" heading |
4 |
Talk:Rind et al. controversy/Archive 4#"Usage outside of scholarly discussions" heading
|
| External links modified |
1 |
Talk:Rind et al. controversy/Archive 4#External links modified 2
|
| Censoring Sex Research |
7 |
Talk:Rind et al. controversy/Archive 4#Censoring Sex Research
|
| Subtle bias? |
23 |
Talk:Rind et al. controversy/Archive 4#Subtle bias?
|
| The sentence in Controversy Section |
1 |
Talk:Rind et al. controversy/Archive 4#The sentence in Controversy Section
|
| Wikipedia Ambassador Program assignment |
1 |
Talk:Rind et al. controversy#Wikipedia Ambassador Program assignment
|
