Talk:Richard Adam
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Trimming of content
[edit]Recent large additions to this page have introduced many errors (formating, linking, syntax, grammar, punctuation). There's some pretty biased language in there too, including the word "lovable." Even if these issues were fixed, we'd still be left with a huge number of claims without citations. Even if THAT were fixed, the bulk of the page has become a CV/collection of trivia. I find a lot of the recent content inappropriate and am going to trim it. If I'm wrong, please let me know - I am happy to work with anyone who wants to improve this page within the scope of what's appropriate Wikipedia content. Thanks. Jessicapierce (talk) 00:48, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you. I started the article, and although one should never try to "own" an article, whoever starts it ought to take some responsibility to try to ensure that the content continues to be of a high standard, especially for living people. Your intervention is much appreciated. Edwardx (talk) 01:16, 9 February 2018 (UTC)