This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism
This article is within the scope of WikiProject African diaspora, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of African diaspora on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.African diasporaWikipedia:WikiProject African diasporaTemplate:WikiProject African diasporaAfrican diaspora
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Discrimination, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Discrimination on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DiscriminationWikipedia:WikiProject DiscriminationTemplate:WikiProject DiscriminationDiscrimination
I deleted large chunks of quotes and redundant paragraphs. The goal is to make this article readable and look similar to something you would find in a average encyclopedia. I think that most of the introduction should be simplified somehow and condensed. A lot more should probably be removed. The idea seems very basic to me: Africans in the US are not a Nation, Equality should be their main goal as well as the main goal of the white working class, and Blacks should join the socialist movement even if it is dominated by whites.M ic07:47, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for cleaning it up. I think you should stop here, however. Let's not get too simple. There are a lot of good ideas in the body of revolutionary integrationist thought, that need to stay in this article. So please don't cut any more. It's fine the way you've edited it up to this point --[Tom Smith, original author] —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.191.15.101 (talk) 12:19, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think we should stop here. This whole article needs significant editing. I have done my best to try to wikify it, but as of now it reads like a very poorly written pamphlet aimed at others on the revolutionary left, not like an encyclopedia article aimed at the general public. Furthermore, the originator of an article does not own that article.Chris902 (talk) 22:52, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
