Talk:Reproducibility Project

Skepticism Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Science Low‑importance

	Science portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject ScienceTemplate:WikiProject Sciencescience
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Psychology High‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

History of Science Low‑importance

	History of science portal This article is part of the History of Science WikiProject, an attempt to improve and organize the history of science content on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. You can also help with the History of Science Collaboration of the Month.History of ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject History of ScienceTemplate:WikiProject History of Sciencehistory of science
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A lot of this work was done by the initial editors, Justin.a.Arp, and katie.anderson.5. And was copied from User:katie.anderson.5/sandbox. Katie.anderson.5 (talk) 19:04, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The text stated 36.1% of the studies replicated. When there are 100 studies this seems a strange number. Further reading stated 35 of the 97 studies kept a positive result, which is indeed 36.1%. Changed the text to specify this. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science NicoLaan (talk) 16:06, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

This article needs additional reliable external sources and a neutral tone. Supsudelu (talk) 09:12, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The project goes beyond psychology

This article primarily discusses the project's psychology-focused initiative, but it has since expanded to other fields (for example, oncology). The article needs to be updated to discuss this wider project, or at least give a more clear indication that the project is still ongoing. StereoFolic (talk) 15:16, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've tried to improve this situation in the introduction, but still the article needs more work in this area. StereoFolic (talk) 15:49, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]