Jump to content

Talk:Renoise

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

This needs more about the herritage of tracking, and how and why it got to prompting Renoise as an idea. It also needs comparrison to other major sequencers as it is quite different in approach.

I agree. Fasttracker, which is very similar in many respects (though many years old), should be mentioned. Furhter, I don't think MIDI should be mentioned in the first paragraph, as Renoise as far as I know is not based on MIDI (but can use it) and most Renoise users never come close to MIDI.

--

I don't agree. The heritage is rather uninteresting, if you look for the sonar or logic-wiki-page you see they don't mention cakewalk or the Atari ST either. People being in the trackerscene know where Renoise comes from and all the other DAW-Users have massive prejiduce against anything which reminds them of the old trackers. 90.186.68.203 22:13, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This article needs work...

[edit]

Unlike major corporate software development, the Renoise development team work with the Renoise user community online to pool ideas for new features as well as work on bug testing.

That's just bad writing. Every fucking commercial software company works with their community for features and bug testing. Even the open source projects do the same. Renoise isn't some fucking special snowflake.

-- I have rewritten it a bit. Thanks for the remarking, although harsh.. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.17.190.58 (talk) 14:28, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

---little bit unnecessary, swearing. The rewritten version is better though. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.32.216.226 (talk) 11:36, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I would more than agree that the article needs quite some work. It would be good to see some more detail about the way Renoise has been developed, features particular to it, the artists using it, and any other relevant stuff. I'd also agree that swearing here is probably not appropriate.Jimjamjak (talk) 09:28, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Citation

[edit]

Someone asked for citation that horizontal notation is more popular than tracker-style notation.. I edited it out because Wikipedia has gone to shit if people can't just use some common sense and do some research.. if you know anything about electronic music production it's common knowledge.

Glad that you are making edits, but it might be a good idea to control your language on talk pages. A separate point: "if you know anything about electronic music production it's common knowledge"... Well, be that as it may, Wikipedia is not for people who already know about a subject, it is an encyclopedia. Common knowledge is welcome, provided it is cited, factually correct and of interest. A quote dealing with both things: "Wikipedia is an online encyclopedia and, as a means to that end, an online community of people interested in building a high-quality encyclopedia in a spirit of mutual respect."Jimjamjak (talk) 09:21, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

I was intrigued to find that Venetian Snares uses Renoise [1]. Does anyone know other artists using it? --85.24.240.236 (talk) 09:37, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Venetian Snares is not alone, although probably the most famous of the artists using Renoise as a production tool. See this list on the Renoise website for more artists, and feel free to add them if you think this is relevant to the article.Jimjamjak (talk) 09:23, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
There is also a page about the artist Hunz, who seems to be rather into using Renoise.Jimjamjak (talk) 09:25, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Renoise. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:10, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:07, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:49, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Renoise&oldid=1200863816"