Jump to content

Talk:Reappropriation

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"Jew" as a pejorative noun

[edit]

This is a misconception, despite having multiple attributions.

"According to The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, fourth edition (2000): "It is widely recognized that the attributive use of the noun Jew, in phrases such as Jew lawyer or Jew ethics, is both vulgar and highly offensive. In such contexts Jewish is the only acceptable possibility. Some people, however, have become so wary of this construction that they have extended the stigma to any use of Jew as a noun, a practice that carries risks of its own. In a sentence such as There are now several Jews on the council, which is unobjectionable, the substitution of a circumlocution like Jewish people or persons of Jewish background may in itself cause offense for seeming to imply that Jew has a negative connotation when used as a noun.""

The pejorative meaning is given when implied by the speaker, just as almost any similar word could be used pejoratively or respectfully, depending on intention. It's not an example of reappropriation; it may be an example of an opposite sort of phenomenon.

Drsruli (talk) 12:56, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

should the word "retard"/"retarded" be added to the list?

[edit]

I've seen many mentally disabled people use it (but this is of course completely anecdotal) 2603:9002:200:5289:8194:F613:BF5:5650 (talk) 08:11, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]