Talk:Raymond Wong Pak-ming

This article is written in Hong Kong English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, travelled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Hong Kong Start‑class Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hong Kong, a project to coordinate efforts in improving all Hong Kong-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Hong Kong-related articles, you are invited to join this project.Hong KongWikipedia:WikiProject Hong KongTemplate:WikiProject Hong KongHong Kong

Start

This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hong Kong To-do:

Attention needed (60)

...needing expert attention (4) • ...without infoboxes (19)

Collaboration needed

Recommend topic

Improvement needed

GA-Class articles (60) • B-Class articles (296)

Cleanup needed

C-Class articles (1,067)

Image needed (348)

Destub needed

Start-Class articles (5,514) • Stub-Class articles (6,679)

Deorphan needed

...orphans

Page creation needed

Requested articles

Miscellaneous tasks

...maintain popularity • ...assess the un-Class (379) • ...assess the un-Importance (1,338)

Requested move 24 January 2015

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. I've moved to Raymond Wong Pak-ming, but I am aware that the VIAF links and sources seem to prefer Bak. As Pale Aqua said below, this may be the wrong version but it's better than the previous one. DrKiernan (talk) 19:38, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Raymond Wong (film presenter) → Raymond Wong Bak-ming – Or Raymond Wong Pak-ming. Because he is not a primary topic, he is deservingly disambiguated. However, the parenthetical disambiguation looks awkward at best. There is nobody disambiguated as "film presenter". This guy has been an actor, a director, a producer, a screenwriter, and a presenter. Sources like Xiamen and The Star use "Bak"; other sources use "Pak", like SCMP and Hollywood Reporter. Per WP:NATURALDIS, parenthetical disambiguation would have been suitable solution if natural disambiguation is not possible. However, these sources make these proposed names possible. By the way, he can't be confused with the other guy, Raymond Wong (actor), also called Raymond Wong Ho-yin. --Relisted. Number 5 7 13:06, 1 March 2015 (UTC) --Relisted. George Ho (talk) 18:28, 4 February 2015 (UTC) George Ho (talk) 21:32, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Use Raymond Wong Pak-ming per SCMP, and local Hong Kong naming style evident in the usage by SCMP. And outside, such as Hollywood Reporter. -- 65.94.40.137 (talk) 09:04, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This HK film book uses "Raymond Wong Bak-ming". --George Ho (talk) 01:05, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support move to his real name. It seems like he is referred to more as "Bak" within Hong Kong sources from my searching. However, his Weibo uses Pak. Wikimandia (talk) 13:01, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Relisting again to try and get a decision between Bak and Pak, as per the request on my talk page. Number 5 7 13:06, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Do this. good idea from proposers though hong konger have very lengthy names. Togashi Yuuta (talk) 06:32, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"Pak" or "Bak", Togashi Yuuta? --George Ho (talk) 22:20, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Checking bing news I get 8 hits for Pak and 11 for Bak. Which doesn't seem significant enough difference to lean in either direction. How about just using the wrong version (i.e. just pick one), redirecting the right one to it and reconsider in the future if better evidence can be found one way or the other. Seems natural disambiguation even if two approximately equal good choices is still better then parenthesis. PaleAqua (talk) 16:46, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I am in favor of naming the article "Raymond Wong Pak-ming". I have a slight preference for "Pak" vs. "Bak", as it seems to be a common transliteration of 百 in Hong Kong, for instance for place names, according to the yet to be better defined in Wikipedia Hong Kong Government Cantonese Romanisation. I agree with PaleAqua: this naming is not absolutely wrong and can easily be changed in the future. I have modified the lede of the article to reflect the two common spellings. Olivier (talk) 14:30, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.