Talk:Rastafari/Archive 10
This is an archive of past discussions about Rastafari. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | ← | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 |
Better source needed?
I have tagged this source: Kitzinger, Sheila (1969). "Protest and Mysticism: The Rastafari Cult of Jamaica". Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion. 8 (2): 240–262. doi:10.2307/1384337. JSTOR 1384337.
The source is from 1969, and seems outdated, so there's probably a more recent source that's more appropriate. Especially as the text says "many Rastafari" hold this belief (present tense), I think we need something more contemporary to back this up, and the wording can then be adjusted if needed based on that. Lewisguile (talk) 10:22, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
- This got removed in the end as I couldn't find any other verification for it as a current view. If anyone has any sources that are updated, please ping me or add it yourself. Lewisguile (talk) 12:49, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
Black supremacy
I'm starting a new topic to make this easier for people to chime in. I've recently tweaked the lede a little, based on discussions with @Midnightblueowl about black supremacy. I'm currently happy with the wording in the lede (as per this diff) and the current wording in the article body, although the discussion did raise the issue of the subject more generally and whether we need to dedicate more space to black supremacy.
My impression is that recent scholarship has tended to focus less on this as an ongoing issue, and tends to emphasise black supremacy as being an early element that arose as a reaction to the colonial/white supremacist system of Jamaica at the time. I wrote about this at length in another thread, which I believe shows how the scholarship has changed. In short, most sources seem to highlight the 1970s as a turning point, coinciding with the "mainstreaming" of Rastafari through reggae music and Marley. Scholarship post-2000, therefore, seems significantly less focused on black supremacy, and tends to discuss it as a limited or historical facet of Rastafari, compared to sources in the prior century.
If we look over at the Encyclopaedia Britannica's page for this subject, and scroll down to the second oldest update on 17 December 2004, there's a striking shift in emphasis at the start of the article which encapsulates this clearly. The BBC also included it in their (now archived) explainer on Rasta beliefs in 2009.
However, I appreciate not everyone will think as I do. So are the lede and body okay now? Do we need to go further? Do we need to do more to do the topic justice?
Some of the sources I gave above may be helpful, so feel free to peruse:
- Barnett, Michael. (2005). "The many faces of Rasta: Doctrinal Diversity within the Rastafari Movement". Caribbean Quarterly, 51:2, 67-78. DOI:10.1080/00086495.2005.11672267
- Charles, Christopher, The Process of Becoming Black: Leonard Howell and the Revelation of Rastafari (December 26, 2013). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2372178 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2372178
- Crockford, Susannah. "Rastafari." In James Crossley and Alastair Lockhart (eds.) Critical Dictionary of Apocalyptic and Millenarian Movements. 15 January 2021. Retrieved from [1]. (First published 3 January 2018 [2].)
- Dagnini, Jérémie Kroubo. « Rastafari: Alternative Religion and Resistance against “White” Christianity », Études caribéennes [En ligne], 12 | Avril 2009, mis en ligne le 15 avril 2009, consulté le 14 octobre 2024. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/etudescaribeennes/3665 ; DOI : https://doi.org/10.4000/etudescaribeennes.3665
- Dunkley, D. A. "Rastafari: Race and Spirituality." Black Resistance in the Americas. Routledge, 2018. 20-29 (23). https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9780429427510-3/rastafari-dunkley
- Erskine, Noel Leo (2005). From Garvey to Marley, Rastafari Theology. Florida: University Press of Florida. ISBN 0813028078.
- Goldson, R. R. (2020). "Liberating the Mind: Rastafari and the Theorization of Maroonage as Epistemological (Dis) engagement". Journal of Black Studies, 51(4), 368-385. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021934720908011
- Price, Charles. "The Cultural Production of a Black Messiah: Ethiopianism and the Rastafari." Journal of Africana Religions 2, no. 3 (2014): 418-433. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/552000
- Miller, Timothy (1995). America's Alternative Religions. SUNY Series in Religious Studies. SUNY Press. ISBN 0-7914-2398-0.
- Mills, Troy R. The Rastafari and the Nation of Islam: From Black Internationalism to Globalization, 1960s–1980s, The University of Iowa, United States -- Iowa, 2022. ProQuest, https://manchester.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/rastafari-nation-islam-black-internationalism/docview/2703567052/se-2?accountid=12253
- Niaah, Jahlani A. H. 2020. “The End of Afropessimism and Their-Story: Rastafari as Ethos.” Inter-Asia Cultural Studies 21 (4): 587–99. doi:10.1080/14649373.2020.1832302
- Taylor, P. D. M. (1990). "Perspectives on history in Rastafari thought". Studies in Religion/Sciences Religieuses, 19(2), 191-205. https://doi.org/10.1177/000842989001900204
Lewisguile (talk) 18:32, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
- I've now gone ahead and broken this out into a section of its own. I've expanded with some recent sources as well as expanding upon the historic ones.
- It seems even in the 1970s people were arguing about this, with the original source being Simpson's analysis, which in turn influenced Barrett's. A lot of sources seem to treat this as a rhetorical thing about subverting white supremacy, rather than actual racism. I've provided some of the context used by the scholars themselves, so it covers some of their nuances. I removed the 1969 psychoanalysis article, since it's quite niche and I can't verify its current accuracy/applicability anyway.
- I'm always keen to hear suggestions or work with others to edit stuff if anyone has any feedback. Lewisguile (talk) 08:02, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- I've similarly updated the section on gender, sex and sexuality, as there was a lack of sources detailing Rasta women. There are some post-2000 papers by scholars of Rasta women that paint a striking contrast—i.e., the movement's general disorganisation has let women take charge in some cases. This is all now mentioned and referenced, along with the continuing concerns (which have been updated a little). Lewisguile (talk) 12:53, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Lewisguile. I appreciate your enthusiasm for this article and your willingness to hunt down excellent quality sources, but could you hold back a little on making mass alterations and additions to the article? This is a Featured Article and a lot of the changes are introducing formatting issues and errors and, given their quantity, are becoming difficult to assess. I don't want to just mass revert everything that you are doing but it is becoming difficult to assess them. Could you raise specific proposals for alteration points at the Talk Page first? Otherwise we are at risk of this article being demoted from its Featured Article status. Midnightblueowl (talk) 10:57, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
- As this article already goes over the guidelines for WP:Article length, what could be a really good idea is to branch off with new articles? We could have an article on Rastafari views on race, for example, which would allow for much more material to be added. This particular article needs to be kept really concise - ideally more concise than it already is in certain places. Midnightblueowl (talk) 11:34, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, I had suggested that in one of the other topics. I will make a list of such potential topics. E.g., a similar page on gender, sex and sexuality could be useful.
- In regards to the previous post, I'm happy to hold back on further edits for now. I think most of what I have found in terms of new sources is in there now. Anything else, I'll add to a new topic or to an existing topic for ease of finding the information. I'll also go through your edits/reversions and see if there's anything to suggest going forward for improved wording. Lewisguile (talk) 11:47, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
- As this article already goes over the guidelines for WP:Article length, what could be a really good idea is to branch off with new articles? We could have an article on Rastafari views on race, for example, which would allow for much more material to be added. This particular article needs to be kept really concise - ideally more concise than it already is in certain places. Midnightblueowl (talk) 11:34, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Lewisguile. I appreciate your enthusiasm for this article and your willingness to hunt down excellent quality sources, but could you hold back a little on making mass alterations and additions to the article? This is a Featured Article and a lot of the changes are introducing formatting issues and errors and, given their quantity, are becoming difficult to assess. I don't want to just mass revert everything that you are doing but it is becoming difficult to assess them. Could you raise specific proposals for alteration points at the Talk Page first? Otherwise we are at risk of this article being demoted from its Featured Article status. Midnightblueowl (talk) 10:57, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
Morality issues
So, there are still some major problems with this section. As is, I don't think it's neutral so I will tag the section as such until we can agree some better wording here. Please don't remove the tags until we can address those issues. I appreciate this was historically rated as FA, but that doesn't mean it can't ever be improved upon or that issues won't later be discovered.
We have the same problem here due to WP:SCAREQUOTES and WP:POVQUOTE for things like "natural" (past the first usage of this term). The example given at those links says "the land is considered 'sacred' to the religion" is non-neutral; "natural" here serves the same purpose. It's a word people will understand, is common to most religions, and is called out as a belief already so doesn't need quotation marks adding. Similarly "what it regards as" is overly disparaging; it implies we're turning our nose up at these views rather than taking a neutral stance on them. It's enough to say "they believe it's natural".
Other words/phrases that are non-neutral: "promotes" ("emphasises" is better), "defending" (suggest rewording as this implies we think they're guilty/need to defend in the first place), "the Rasta tendency" (reads as stereotyping; swap for "the Jewish tendency" and you can see the issue—"the Rasta belief in x means y" is better), "derogatorily" ("dismiss" is enough), "legitimise" (suggest rewording along the lines of "they believe x because y"), "insists" (implies special pleasing; another word needed), "antidote" (ironically, non-neutral instead; suggest rewording by along the lines of "as an alternative to...")
Dubious and needs updating:
- "Rastafari women usually accept this subordinate position and regard it as their duty to obey their men." This is sourced by one person. I'll tag it as such.
- "Rasta discourse often presents women as morally weak and susceptible to deception by evil, and claims that they are impure while menstruating." Needs updating.
The issue with both of these is that they're written in present tense but aren't very current. You've also removed any nuance based on contemporary sources from this section re: gender and sex, which makes the matter worse. If it's particularly important to discuss issues of gender and sex, then it should be done properly. If it's all a matter of space, then we should leave the entire topic for another page. I will tag it as outdated. This is one area where I strongly object to the current wording. I know you're worried about changes affecting the FA status, but I would argue that these existing issues are the problem, not attempts to fix them.Lewisguile (talk) 12:46, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
- Forgot to tag you, @Midnightblueowl Lewisguile (talk) 12:47, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Lewisguile and thanks for your message. I'm more than happy to see changes made to the section. My concerns about your quite substantial alterations were primarily to do with expansion; the whole article is rather long already and needs to be trimmed down, not expanded, so any completely new information should ideally go into the new Rasta views on gender and sexuality page (which is where I have moved all of your edits, as I didn't want to just delete your work completely). In particular I think we should avoid an overuse of "Professor X suggested this" and then "Scholar Y thought that...". We can't be rid of that altogether but it can end up reading poorly if overdone.
- I was also unconvinced by the splintering of the section into many little sub-sections, which did not fit with the general structure of the article and I thought looked a bit messy. All this being said, I'm very happy to see changes in language made where you have concerns. Let me re-integrate some of your proposed wording back into the article, which hopefully deals with your concerns about current prose problems, and then we can talk further about additional changes. Midnightblueowl (talk) 13:12, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
- I went with a single disputed tag rather than multiple in-line tags. Thanks for offering to do that. I was going to go over specific wording with some suggestions here, but I'll hang fire till you do the next edit. Thanks, I appreciate it. Lewisguile (talk) 13:21, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
- I've made my reversions, Lewisguile, so take a look and see what you think. I've tried to take your concerns into account while also keeping things as clean and concise as I can. I've also included a sub-section split between "gender issues" and "sexuality", as your original edits suggested. Midnightblueowl (talk) 13:26, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
- I'm satisfied. This is really good work, thank you. I've removed the tag already.
- I removed one word from this section ("disparagingly dismiss" is now just "dismiss") and added one sentence from the new gender article, which hopefully isn't too long. If it needs compressing further, feel free to take a stab at it or let me know and I'll see if we can shave some wording off.
- I'll go ahead and set up that page on the afterlife, too, since there's probably loads that can go into that (Hindu Sadhana, Christian eschatology, etc).
- Thanks again for taking time out of your weekend to update this! I think this is looking really strong now. Lewisguile (talk) 16:19, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
- I've made my reversions, Lewisguile, so take a look and see what you think. I've tried to take your concerns into account while also keeping things as clean and concise as I can. I've also included a sub-section split between "gender issues" and "sexuality", as your original edits suggested. Midnightblueowl (talk) 13:26, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
References
Updates - beliefs, creeds
The article talks about how diverse beliefs are within Rastafari, but is that diversity currently represented? Most of the core material relates to Jamaican Rastafari in the 20th century, but perhaps other groups have different beliefs?
I have added some updated RSes to this section, and expanded a little where necessary (e.g., around death, eternal life/reincarnation, etc). I'd be keen to see more of what differentiates, say, Maori Rastas or Japanese Rastas, and whether any of this has resolved into unique Mansions or creeds. (The article says Rastas don't have any creeds, but the Niyabinghi seem to have a published creed which is named as such. I've left that alone for now.)
Some of this may just need to go in the section for the different global movements. That works too. Lewisguile (talk) 13:14, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
Jah and Jesus Christ
@Midnightblueowl How about something like: "Since Rastas believe god is within everybody, some believe that Christ is a title and anyone can become like Christ."
I'm not super keen on the piping, so we could remove it and include that bit of detail in a separate page where it's more appropriate? (It's already on the Incarnation page anyway.)
The rewording on Kumina and Convince is good, and works for me. Lewisguile (talk) 12:03, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
- I'm okay with a discussion of the "Christ" label being added to the article, but it is important that we keep it concise. What is the wording that the original source actually uses, so we can be clear that we are accurately repeating its meaning? Midnightblueowl (talk) 12:19, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
- I think it's okay left out of this version. It's on the page for Incarnationt
, which seems more apt for now. I'd we ever get a God in Rastafari page it can probably go there. Lewisguile (talk) 22:33, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
Haile Selassie seen as...
I have trimmed this paragraph a little since I added some text to address the non-specific wording of "Rastafari beliefs are based on a specific interpretation of the Bible" and the whole was getting a little long.
I hope I have covered all the bases by simply saying Haile Selassie is "variously seen as the Second Coming of Jesus, Jah incarnate and a human prophet" (since a human prophet who symbolises Jah incarnate is probably covered by the prior option).
However, it occurred to me that some Rasta sources see him as the Second Coming but not Jesus. Or rather, they see him as the Messiah but not necessarily the same Messiah as "Eurocentric" Christianity. So is it worth adding "Messiah" in there as well? This could be done either by giving it as a fourth option, or by replacing "Jesus" specifically with "Messiah" generally, since then we can cover both options in one. (Maybe "Messiah" needs linking to Messiah#Christianity to clarify?)
As a side note, I linked "partially resides within each person" to Immanence, since elsewhere we describe this as immanence and it's helpful context for people wanting to explore that aspect. I may add Rasta immanence to that Wiki page, since it's influenced, at least in part, by Hinduism, so will have some nuances that aren't covered by the Christian concept. Lewisguile (talk) 07:36, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Rasta views of Jah added to Incarnation instead, as more relevant. The Hindu link is noted. Lewisguile (talk) 12:50, 25 October 2024 (UTC)