Talk:Randolph diagram

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Randolph diagram article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
	This article was accepted on 18 March 2012 by reviewer Cerebellum (talk · contribs).

Add definition

Add a proper definition to the article. Franklindotvp (talk) 17:22, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Would it be appropriate to mention this notation on related pages, such as those concerned with logic and set theory? Mostly I'm wondering if it's notable enough, though there might be other criteria I'm missing. I ask because I find this notation to be interesting on a personal level, but I didn't want to give undue weight to my preferences. JonathanHopeThisIsUnique (talk) 21:27, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]