This article needs an image (preferably free) related to the subject, such as a picture of the set or a film poster. Please ensure that non-free content guidelines are properly observed.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
@Donaldd23 removed the notability tag with the edit message "Has multiple reviews (added another one) and award winner. Passes WP:NFILM". I'm not sure I'm convinced. The review added is from Film Threat, which is a site that does paid reviews. Since 2011, those seeking a review from the site can pay between $50 and $400 for varying levels of service, ranging from a "guaranteed review within 7–10 days" to a package that includes a guarantee of "100K minimum impressions". It's not clear to me if paid reviews are disclosed on the review page. If this is a paid review, it certainly does not help establish notability.
Hello Jfire, I've added a few of the existing reviews (including the one in Film Threat; but I take notice of what you say about that site) and concur with Donaldd23's assessment. I've also re-removed the tag. I do believe notability is clear here. Best, -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank)21:48, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Mushy Yank, good to see you, and thanks for the sourcing effort. I see that Film Threat is quite widely cited on WP, so I started a thread at RSN to solicit opinions on its reliability in light of the paid review service. Jfire (talk) 01:31, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]