Talk:Radford family

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

BLP

I've categorised this as a biography of a living person, because it is. That means I've junked The Sun and not used the Daily Mail or the Express. I have used a couple of TV guide sites for stuff about the content of the programmes, and for the children's names and birth years, but probably the birth dates should be removed unless they are given in the programmes or are out there plain to see in the family's Facebook. That is an acceptable external link if they don't have a separate site; what's its address? Yngvadottir (talk) 18:07, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi i would like this page to protected please Jonesylk98x (talk) 02:30, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Documenting the family tree through a table.

Seeing as the information of the families children have been added to the article in the form of a table as is common with the Duggar Family of 19 Kids and Counting and other families, is there a specific reason as to why the information is not to be included? It would be beneficial to the article as it gives more understanding about the family. Leaky.Solar (talk) 16:57, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Listing the minors' DOBs is a WP:BLP violation and the table has been repeatedly rejected.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:06, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for letting me know about this, as it is new information to me. Is there any reason as it is upheld here and not on the many pages about the Duggar family? Also would it be more suitable to just list them in a chart without their date of birth? Leaky.Solar (talk) 17:21, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

As far as the Duggar article, first WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS, second it's more complicated because most of the "children" in the table are adults (at least now). As far as adding a table here without the DOBs, what would make such a table noteworthy?--Bbb23 (talk) 17:24, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dates of birth

If we are going to keep the Dates of birth in, consider using the {{birth date and age| yyyy|mm|dd|df=y}} template to make updates easier; presumably with so many the ages are likely to be outdated quickly if this isn't kept on top of? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 51.9.7.102 (talk) 19:43, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If there's ever sourcing enough to meet WP:BLPPRIVACY, then we can do that. Except for any WP:MINORS, of course. Woodroar (talk) 02:25, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]