Talk:Quince/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nominator: Chiswick Chap (talk · contribs) 10:15, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: BigChrisKenney (talk · contribs) 03:07, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
Hello, @Chiswick Chap: I'll be reviewing this article for the January 2025 GAN Backlog Drive.
- Many thanks!
Intro
[edit]Good!
Description
[edit]Made and edit you may wish to review.
- All right.
History
[edit]Added a link you may wish to review.
- Tweaked.
Cultivation
[edit]Good!
Uses
[edit]I made an edit you may wish to review.
- Tweaked.
Cultural associations
[edit]Good!
Inital Review
Another great article with minimum alterations needing to be made. I will await your reply before posting my final assesment. BigChrisKenney (talk) 05:02, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Done.
Sources
[edit][11] I am not sure why this is here. It references another Wikipedia article, Theophrastus, and that article does not mention quince, then following a link to his Enquiry into Plants, that doesn't mention quince either. Consider removal?
- It's certainly a relevant fact, and it's supported by a full and (on inspection) correct citation to a chapter and section of Theophrastus's book. There is no reason why such a fact should be in the biography or book article, as these cover much broader subjects.
[28] The archived, original link is dead. BigChrisKenney (talk) 00:47, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Link is marked as such.